Paper · 2023 · Revista Agrogeoambiental

Agronomic characteristics and yield of corn after inoculation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

Ariana Vieira Silva; Jaqueline de Melo Gonçalves; Natalia Costa; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Corn is one of the most important crops in Brazil and, due to its physiological characteristics, it has a high productive potential and high nutritional quality, for animal and human nutrition. Therefore, this work sought to evaluate Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 on agronomic characteristics and yield of corn crop. A randomized block design was used, with six doses of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. Plantarum FZB42 (0.0; 2.5; 5.0; 7.5; 10.0, and 12.5 mL kg-1 seeds) and four repetitions, totaling 24 experimental units. The study was conducted in the experimental area of annual crops of the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sul de Minas Gerais (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of the South of Minas Gerais — IFSULDEMINAS), Muzambinho Campus, in the 2017/18 agricultural year. The agronomic evaluations were: plant height, upper ear insertion height, culm diameter, leaf nitrogen content, forage fresh mass, incidence of Fusarium in the ear, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, mass of 1000 grains, and yield. The nutritional evaluations performed were: crude protein, ash, ether extract, crude fiber, fiber in acid detergent, and fiber in neutral detergent. In summary, the inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. Plantarum FZB42 in corn seeds, regardless of the dose applied, did not interfere with the agronomic characteristics and nutritional quality of corn silage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42 on corn seeds, regardless of dose, did not interfere with agronomic characteristics and nutritional quality of corn silage.

Treatment
inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. Plantarum FZB42 in corn seedse1
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. Plantarum FZB42Bacillus amyloliquefaciense1symbiont
Outcome
agronomic characteristics and nutritional quality of corn silagee1
Direction
did not interferee1
Qualifier
regardless of the dose appliede1
Setting
Muzambinho Campuse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. Plantarum FZB42 in corn seeds, regardless of the dose applied, did not interfere with the agronomic characteristics and nutritional quality of corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1451 · show in text ↑
e2

“Muzambinho Campus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–806 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.