Abstract
Afield experiment was laid out at agronomy research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana during 2013–14 to evaluate the effect of various nutrient sources on yield and soil health in wheat under pearl millet-wheat cropping system. Maximum grain, straw and biological yield were recorded in T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat) which was significantly higher over all the treatments except T5. Organic carbon content was slightly increased from that of onset of the experiment to the end of the experiment at a depth of 0–15 cm. Significantly highest organic carbon (50% RD-NP +50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100%RD-NP in wheat) was also observed in T6 that improved thesoil health in termsof positive nutrient balance. The organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent. At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave the highest grain, straw and biological yield of wheat, significantly higher than all treatments except T5.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat)e1
- Outcome
- grain, straw and biological yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- all the treatments except T5e1
- Setting
- Hisar, Haryanae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e0“Afield experiment was laid out at agronomy research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana during 2013–14”
e1“Maximum grain, straw and biological yield were recorded in T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat) which was significantly higher over all the treatments except T5”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil organic carbon slightly increased in the wheat plots from the onset to the end of the experiment at 0–15 cm depth.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- Organic carbon contente2
- Direction
- slightly increasede2
- Qualifier
- at a depth of 0–15 cme2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e2“Organic carbon content was slightly increased from that of onset of the experiment to the end of the experiment at a depth of 0–15 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest organic carbon in the soil.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T6e3
- Outcome
- organic carbone3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e3“Significantly highest organic carbon (50% RD-NP +50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100%RD-NP in wheat) was also observed in T6”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- organic carbon at the end of the experimente4
- Value
- 0.34 to 0.51 per cente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e4“The organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH ranged from 7.86 to 8.10 at the end of the experiment.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- pHe5
- Value
- 7.86 to 8.10e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e5“At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest soil pH among all treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T6e5
- Outcome
- pHe5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Comparator
- among all the treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”
e5“At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
256 papers more in this group
See all 260 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.