Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources

Babli Babli; Priti Malik

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Afield experiment was laid out at agronomy research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana during 2013–14 to evaluate the effect of various nutrient sources on yield and soil health in wheat under pearl millet-wheat cropping system. Maximum grain, straw and biological yield were recorded in T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat) which was significantly higher over all the treatments except T5. Organic carbon content was slightly increased from that of onset of the experiment to the end of the experiment at a depth of 0–15 cm. Significantly highest organic carbon (50% RD-NP +50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100%RD-NP in wheat) was also observed in T6 that improved thesoil health in termsof positive nutrient balance. The organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent. At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave the highest grain, straw and biological yield of wheat, significantly higher than all treatments except T5.

Treatment
T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat)e1
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
all the treatments except T5e1
Setting
Hisar, Haryanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Afield experiment was laid out at agronomy research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana during 2013–14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum grain, straw and biological yield were recorded in T6 (50% RD-NP + 50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100% RD-NP in wheat) which was significantly higher over all the treatments except T5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon slightly increased in the wheat plots from the onset to the end of the experiment at 0–15 cm depth.

Outcome
Organic carbon contente2
Direction
slightly increasede2
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–15 cme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“Organic carbon content was slightly increased from that of onset of the experiment to the end of the experiment at a depth of 0–15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest organic carbon in the soil.

Treatment
T6e3
Outcome
organic carbone3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significantly highest organic carbon (50% RD-NP +50% N through FYM in pearl millet and 100%RD-NP in wheat) was also observed in T6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent.

Outcome
organic carbon at the end of the experimente4
Value
0.34 to 0.51 per cente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e4

“The organic carbon at the end of the experiment ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH ranged from 7.86 to 8.10 at the end of the experiment.

Outcome
pHe5
Value
7.86 to 8.10e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest soil pH among all treatments.

Treatment
T6e5
Outcome
pHe5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
among all the treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and soil health studies in wheat in pearl millet-wheat cropping system as influenced by various nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the end of the experiment pH ranged from from 7.86 to 8.10 and it was highest in T6 among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–981 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.