Paper · 2001 · Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society

Muskmelon fruit response to k source and method of application

George Hochmuth; Márk Gál

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

'Athena' muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) was grown in 1999 in Gainesville, Fla., on polyethylenemulched raised beds with drip irrigation to evaluate effects of K source and method of K application on fruit yield. The soil was low in Mehlich-1 K and 160 lbs per acre (4-ft bed centers) K were applied for the season from KCI, K2SO4, or KNO3. The K was applied either 100% preplant incorporated in the bed or in 12 equal weekly injections through the drip irrigation system. N was supplied at 190 lbs per acre from NH4NO3 (and KNO3), with a combination of incorporated and injected N. All muskmelons received Mg and S from MgSO4. Early yield (first harvest) was not affected by K source. Total-season (five harvests) yield averaged 470 cwt per acre (23.5 tons per acre) and was not affected by K source. Early yield was not affected by K application method, but total-season fruit production was greater with fertigation than with preplant incorporation of K.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield of muskmelon was not affected by K source.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
Treatment
K sourcee3
Outcome
Early yield (first harvest)e3
Direction
not affectede3
Setting
Gainesville, Fla.e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“'Athena' muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) was grown in 1999 in Gainesville, Fla., on polyethylenemulched raised beds with drip irrigation to evaluate effects of K source and method of K application on fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
e3

“Early yield (first harvest) was not affected by K source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total-season yield of muskmelon averaged 470 cwt per acre and was not affected by K source.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
Treatment
K sourcee4
Outcome
Total-season (five harvests) yielde4
Direction
not affectede4
Value
470 cwt per acree4
Setting
Gainesville, Fla.e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“'Athena' muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) was grown in 1999 in Gainesville, Fla., on polyethylenemulched raised beds with drip irrigation to evaluate effects of K source and method of K application on fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
e4

“Total-season (five harvests) yield averaged 470 cwt per acre (23.5 tons per acre) and was not affected by K source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield of muskmelon was not affected by K application method.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
Treatment
K application methode5
Outcome
Early yielde5
Direction
not affectede5
Setting
Gainesville, Fla.e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“'Athena' muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) was grown in 1999 in Gainesville, Fla., on polyethylenemulched raised beds with drip irrigation to evaluate effects of K source and method of K application on fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early yield was not affected by K application method, but total-season fruit production was greater with fertigation than with preplant incorporation of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total-season fruit production of muskmelon was greater with fertigation than with preplant incorporation of K.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis meloe1
Treatment
fertigatione5
Outcome
total-season fruit productione5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
preplant incorporatione5
Setting
Gainesville, Fla.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“'Athena' muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) was grown in 1999 in Gainesville, Fla., on polyethylenemulched raised beds with drip irrigation to evaluate effects of K source and method of K application on fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early yield was not affected by K application method, but total-season fruit production was greater with fertigation than with preplant incorporation of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–969 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

potassium · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.