Paper · 1992 · Agricultural and Food Science

The effect of growth substrate and fertilizer on the growth and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection of three hosts

Mauritz Vestberg

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of growth substrate in combination with two compound fertilizers or bone meal on the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) infection and growth of micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.) was studied in pot experiments. With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used. A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizal, is suggested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for rapid mycorrhizal infection in strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
rapid VA mycorrhizal infectione1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for rapid mycorrhizal infection in arctic bramble.

Taxon
arctic bramblee0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
rapid VA mycorrhizal infectione1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for rapid mycorrhizal infection in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
rapid VA mycorrhizal infectione1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for VAM fungal sporulation with strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
sporulation of the VAM fungie1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for VAM fungal sporulation with arctic bramble.

Taxon
arctic bramblee0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
sporulation of the VAM fungie1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone-meal-fertilized sand was superior to richer peat substrates for VAM fungal sporulation with maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sand fertilized with bone meale1
Interactor
VAM fungie1symbiont
Outcome
sporulation of the VAM fungie1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
richer peat-based substratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micropropagated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) and arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.), as well as maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“With all test plants, sand fertilized with bone meal was superior to the richer peat-based substrates in initiating rapid VA mycorrhizal infection and sporulation of the VAM fungi used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–501 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fertilizer management that yields sufficiently sized and mycorrhizal strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizal, is suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–614 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fertilizer management that yields sufficiently sized and mycorrhizal arctic bramble plants.

Taxon
arctic bramblee0
Outcome
A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizale1

Verbatim

e0

“arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizal, is suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–614 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fertilizer management that yields sufficiently sized and mycorrhizal maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“A fertilizing regime yielding plants of a sufficient size, which at the same time are mycorrhizal, is suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–614 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

84 papers: 56 positive, 28 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Conventionally treated fields had more Diplodia stalk rot.

    Maize Yields and Soil Nutrient Levels With and Without Pesticides and Standard Commercial Fertilizers1 · 1980 · compared with no herbicides, insecticides, or standard commercial fertilizers

    Opposite direction

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

growing medium · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.