Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Engineering Research

Effect of Drying on Physicochemical and Nutritional Quality of Ficus carica (Fig)

Koturwar Manoj; Deepak Bornare; Babar Kalyan

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the consequences of various process ways i.e. sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD) of fresh fruits (FS) for ficus carica in terms of proximate, physical, nutritional and phytochemical composition are studied Analysis of information showed that drying techniques improved the macromolecule, carbohydrates, ash content, total phenol, antioxidant activities and mineral content. The result obtained during this analysis is clearly indicated that some process ways area unit established smart for additional nutrient retention as compared to different. This study aim to form shoppers conscious of the consequences of process ways on nutritional value of fruits which they should become aware of consumption seasonal recent fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun and tray drying improved macromolecule, carbohydrate and ash content of fig fruit.

Taxon
ficus caricaFicus caricae1
Organ / stage
fresh fruits (FS)e1
Treatment
sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD)e1
Outcome
macromolecule, carbohydrates, ash contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD) of fresh fruits (FS) for ficus carica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“drying techniques improved the macromolecule, carbohydrates, ash content, total phenol, antioxidant activities and mineral content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun and tray drying improved total phenol, antioxidant activity and mineral content of fig fruit.

Taxon
ficus caricaFicus caricae1
Organ / stage
fresh fruits (FS)e1
Treatment
sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD)e1
Outcome
total phenol, antioxidant activities and mineral contente2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD) of fresh fruits (FS) for ficus carica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“drying techniques improved the macromolecule, carbohydrates, ash content, total phenol, antioxidant activities and mineral content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some drying process ways were established as better for additional nutrient retention than others.

Taxon
ficus caricaFicus caricae1
Treatment
some process wayse3
Outcome
nutrient retentione3
Direction
smart for additional nutrient retentione3
Comparator
differente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sun drying (SD) and tray drying (TD) of fresh fruits (FS) for ficus carica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“some process ways area unit established smart for additional nutrient retention as compared to different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–562 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.