Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T 5 retained higher ascorbic acid, phenolics and antioxidant activity than T 4 and T 3.

A claim from Expounding the influence of chemicals and processing techniques on the shelf life of Fig (Ficus carica L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 5 retained higher ascorbic acid, phenolics and antioxidant activity than T 4 and T 3.

Taxon
Figt0
Treatment
blanching +4% AA dipped for 10 mine0
Outcome
ascorbic acid, phenolics and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
T 3 (blanching +2% AA dipped for 10 min)e0
Comparator
T 4e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“T 5 (blanching +4% AA dipped for 10 min) stood prominent in retaining higher ascorbic acid, phenolics and antioxidant activity followed by T 4 (blanching +3% AA dipped for 10 min) and T 3 (blanching +2% AA dipped for 10 min).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–469
t0

“Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–88

Title

Expounding the influence of chemicals and processing techniques on the shelf life of Fig (Ficus carica L.)

Anwaar Ahmed; Muhammad Nadeem; Rai Muhammad Amir; et al. ScienceAsia 2019. doi:10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2019.45.547

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ece9a0ea9cab67dae3998bb3da644b286832cc33f4809bffcbff0588d610fa50 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

ascorbic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.