Paper · 2017 · Plant Health Progress

Fungicide Selection and Nozzle Arrangement Impact Target Spot Control and Yield of Cotton

A. K. Hagan; K. L. Bowen; B. Miller; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Target spot is an emerging disease in cotton. Studies in southwest and central Alabama in 2013 and 2014 assessed Headline 2.09SC and Quadris 2.08SC efficacy against target spot for improving yield when applied in an over-the-top or drop-nozzle configuration to the susceptible Phytogen 499 WRF and partially resistant Deltapine 1252 B2RF varieties. At three location-years, onset occurred in late July and exceeded 50% defoliation by mid-September; dry weather suppressed disease at the fourth location. Final defoliation was lower for the Headline drop than for the over-the-top nozzle arrangement and lower than Quadris regardless of nozzle arrangement. Despite higher defoliation of Phytogen 499 WRF, both varieties had similar yields at two locations in 2013 and inconsistent yields in 2014. Relative area under the disease curve (relAUC) for defoliation differed by fungicide treatment across location-years. Fungicides increased yields at one location in 2013, with greater yields for the Headline and Quadris drop-nozzle treatments than the control. Across three location-years with >50% defoliation, Headline drop-nozzle treatment improved Phytogen 499 WRF yield compared with no treatment. Despite better control, higher costs and maintenance issues will limit drop-nozzle use. Results show that a partially resistant variety is an effective target spot-management tool.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Target spot began in late July and defoliation exceeded 50% by mid-September at three location-years.

Outcome
defoliatione0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
50%e0
Setting
three location-yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At three location-years, onset occurred in late July and exceeded 50% defoliation by mid-September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weather suppressed disease at the fourth location.

Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
dry weathere0
Setting
fourth locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weather suppressed disease at the fourth location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Headline applied with drop nozzles reduced final defoliation relative to over-the-top application.

Treatment
Headline drope0
Outcome
Final defoliatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
over-the-top nozzle arrangemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final defoliation was lower for the Headline drop than for the over-the-top nozzle arrangement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Headline drop nozzles reduced final defoliation relative to Quadris regardless of arrangement.

Treatment
Headline drope0
Outcome
Final defoliatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Quadrise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final defoliation was lower for the Headline drop than for the over-the-top nozzle arrangement and lower than Quadris regardless of nozzle arrangement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytogen 499 WRF had higher defoliation than the other variety.

Material
Phytogen 499 WRFe0
Outcome
defoliatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite higher defoliation of Phytogen 499 WRF, both varieties had similar yields at two locations in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cotton varieties had similar yields at two locations in 2013.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Setting
two locations in 2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both varieties had similar yields at two locations in 2013 and inconsistent yields in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety yields were inconsistent in 2014.

Outcome
yieldse0
Setting
2014e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inconsistent yields in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative defoliation disease-curve area differed by fungicide treatment across location-years.

Treatment
fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
Relative area under the disease curve (relAUC) for defoliatione0
Setting
location-yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative area under the disease curve (relAUC) for defoliation differed by fungicide treatment across location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased cotton yield at one 2013 location.

Treatment
Fungicidese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
one location in 2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides increased yields at one location in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Headline drop-nozzle treatment yielded more than control at one 2013 location.

Treatment
Headlinee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
one location in 2013e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater yields for the Headline and Quadris drop-nozzle treatments than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“at one location in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–965 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadris drop-nozzle treatment yielded more than control at one 2013 location.

Treatment
Quadris drop-nozzle treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
one location in 2013e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater yields for the Headline and Quadris drop-nozzle treatments than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“at one location in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–965 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Headline drop-nozzle treatment improved Phytogen 499 WRF yield versus no treatment over three high-defoliation location-years.

Material
Phytogen 499 WRFe0
Treatment
Headline drop-nozzle treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
>50% defoliatione0
Comparator
no treatmente0
Setting
three location-yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across three location-years with >50% defoliation, Headline drop-nozzle treatment improved Phytogen 499 WRF yield compared with no treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1197 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude costs and maintenance will limit drop-nozzle use.

Outcome
drop-nozzle usee0
Qualifier
higher costs and maintenance issuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher costs and maintenance issues will limit drop-nozzle use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A partially resistant variety is an effective target spot management tool.

Outcome
a partially resistant variety is an effective target spot-management toole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a partially resistant variety is an effective target spot-management tool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.