Paper · 2018 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Thorn apple (Datura stramonium L.) allelopathy on cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Zimbabwe

Sakadzo Nyasha; Innocent Pahla; Simbarashe Muzemu; et al.

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Datura stramonium extracts have allelopathic properties. The study was conducted to investigate the allelopathic effects of D. stramonium weed on seed germination, early seedling growth and dry biomass of crop plants (Triticum aestivum and Vigna unguiculata). Laboratory and greenhouse trials were arranged as completely randomised design and the field pot experiment was arranged as a randomised complete block design. Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrations were applied to determine their effects on seed germination, early seedling growth of crops under laboratory, field and greenhouse conditions. Distilled water (0%) acted as a control. Results from the study indicated that germination, shoot length and dry weight significantly decreased proportionally (p<0.001) as the concentration increased from 2 to 8%. The results showed that D. stramonium has allelopathic effects on wheat and cowpeas, hence cannot be used as a bio herbicide to control Tagetes minuta and Amaranthus hybridus on the selected crops since it is non selective to the crops studied. There is therefore need for further research on screening of arable crops against the allelopathic effects of D. stramonium. This will help to identify arable crops which are not negatively affected by allelochemicals from D. stramonium weed so that it can be used as a selective bio herbicide against other weeds. Key words: Allelopathy, aqueous leaf extract, Datura stramonium, Triticum aestivum, Vigna unguiculata.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing D. stramonium leaf extract concentration from 2 to 8% significantly decreased crop germination.

Taxon
cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Vigna unguiculataTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrationse1
Interactor
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume1weed
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
p<0.001e0
Comparator
Distilled water (0%)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination, shoot length and dry weight significantly decreased proportionally (p<0.001) as the concentration increased from 2 to 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“Distilled water (0%) acted as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing extract concentration significantly decreased crop shoot length.

Taxon
cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Vigna unguiculataTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrationse1
Interactor
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume1weed
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Distilled water (0%)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination, shoot length and dry weight significantly decreased proportionally (p<0.001) as the concentration increased from 2 to 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“Distilled water (0%) acted as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing extract concentration significantly decreased crop dry weight.

Taxon
cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Vigna unguiculataTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrationse1
Interactor
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume1weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Distilled water (0%)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination, shoot length and dry weight significantly decreased proportionally (p<0.001) as the concentration increased from 2 to 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aqueous leaf extracts of D. stramonium at 2, 4, 6 and 8% concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“Distilled water (0%) acted as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against using D. stramonium as a bioherbicide on these crops because it also harms the crops.

Interactor
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume1weed
Outcome
cannot be used as a bio herbicidee0
Qualifier
non selective to the crops studiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cannot be used as a bio herbicide to control Tagetes minuta and Amaranthus hybridus on the selected crops since it is non selective to the crops studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“D. stramonium has allelopathic effects on wheat and cowpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–932 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend screening arable crops for susceptibility to D. stramonium allelopathy.

Taxon
arable cropse0
Interactor
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume0weed
Outcome
screening of arable crops against the allelopathic effects of D. stramoniume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further research on screening of arable crops against the allelopathic effects of D. stramonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1217 · show in text ↑

Datura stramonium · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Datura stramonium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 60 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.