Paper · 1970 · Vestnik of the Russian agricultural science

CORN YIELD DEPENDENCE ON THE BASIC TILLAGE

V. N Pavlenko; D. А. Yushkin; V. I. Pavlenko

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Main tillage is a common part of the crop production technology that causes substantial changes of the surface structure of soils and affects its various physical, chemical and biological properties. It can be done with a diverse set of methods and techniques understood as an action of tillage implements on a soil by dint of active parts having various modifications that alter tillage composition of soil significantly. The role of mechanical soil treatment in the modern agriculture has been changing dramatically. Widespread introduction of alternative techniques (such as plowless, minimal and soil-protective tillage) in the production necessitated the clarification of significance of the moldboard plowing in alteration of structural and aggregate properties of soil in various physical geographical zones. Based on our experimental data the plowless soil tillage retains more nutrients than that of the disk harrowing. In particular, nitrogen content of the soil is 42.6 % higher, while with chisel plowing the difference is 41.2 %. It can be derived from analyzing these data that preservation of soil fertility and its structure requires that more attention is paid to the plowless tillage, and in case of weed infestation it should be supplemented with the chisel tillage to a depth of 0.45 … 0.5 m which improves structure and water-air climate of the soil, and on average increases yields by 18-24 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowless soil tillage retains more soil nutrients than disk harrowing.

Treatment
plowless soil tillagee1
Outcome
nutrientse1
Direction
retains moree1
Comparator
disk harrowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on our experimental data the plowless soil tillage retains more nutrients than that of the disk harrowing. In particular, nitrogen content of the soil is 42.6 % higher, while with chisel plowing the difference is 41.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowless soil tillage gave 42.6 % higher soil nitrogen content than disk harrowing.

Treatment
plowless soil tillagee1
Outcome
nitrogen content of the soile1
Direction
highere1
Value
42.6 %e1
Comparator
disk harrowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on our experimental data the plowless soil tillage retains more nutrients than that of the disk harrowing. In particular, nitrogen content of the soil is 42.6 % higher, while with chisel plowing the difference is 41.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel plowing gave a 41.2 % difference in soil nitrogen content relative to disk harrowing.

Treatment
chisel plowinge1
Outcome
nitrogen content of the soile1
Direction
highere1
Value
41.2 %e1
Comparator
disk harrowinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on our experimental data the plowless soil tillage retains more nutrients than that of the disk harrowing. In particular, nitrogen content of the soil is 42.6 % higher, while with chisel plowing the difference is 41.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage on average increased corn yields by 18-24 %.

Treatment
chisel tillagee2
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
increasese4
Value
18-24 %e4
Qualifier
on averagee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e2

“should be supplemented with the chisel tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1284 · show in text ↑
e4

“on average increases yields by 18-24 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage improved soil structure and water-air climate.

Treatment
chisel tillagee2
Outcome
structuree3
Direction
improvese3
Qualifier
water-air climate of the soile3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e2

“should be supplemented with the chisel tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1284 · show in text ↑
e3

“which improves structure and water-air climate of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1370 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that more attention be paid to plowless tillage to preserve soil fertility.

Outcome
preservation of soil fertilitye5
Qualifier
more attention is paid to the plowless tillagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CORN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e5

“preservation of soil fertility and its structure requires that more attention is paid to the plowless tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1201 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.