Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Various Protected Structures on Physiological Response of Tomato Cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

M. Sasirekha; B.B. Channappagoudar; S.M. Mantur; et al.

9
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Hi-Tech Horticultural Unit, Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during rabi, 2015-16 to study physiological responses of tomato cultivars viz., STH-801, STH-510 and STH-39to three different protected conditions viz., polyhouse, shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net. Among the different growing conditions, polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively), higher light transmission ratio (36.54, 22.92 and 19.17 % 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively), canopy temperature (27.85, 35.16 and 37.85 °Cat 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively), specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate (20.59, 17.48 and 15.67µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively) which resulted in higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net. The tomato hybrid, STH-801 was found to have significantly highest canopy temperature, specific leaf weight (7.97, 9.22 and 9.29 mg cm-2 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively), photosynthetic rate, yield (2.43 kg p-1 and 82.17 t ha-1) as compared to STH-510 and STH-39. The tomato hybrid, STH-801 showed optimum height, higher light transmission ratio, canopy temperature, specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate and yield under polyhouse condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse plants had significantly lower height than plants under shade nets.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cme0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions had higher light transmission ratio than shade nets.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
light transmission ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.54, 22.92 and 19.17 %e0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher light transmission ratio (36.54, 22.92 and 19.17 % 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions had higher canopy temperature.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Value
27.85, 35.16 and 37.85 °Ce0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canopy temperature (27.85, 35.16 and 37.85 °Cat 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions increased specific leaf weight.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
specific leaf weighte0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate (20.59, 17.48 and 15.67µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse plants had higher photosynthetic rates.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Value
20.59, 17.48 and 15.67µmol CO2 m-2 s-1e0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rate (20.59, 17.48 and 15.67µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions produced higher yield than 35% and 50% shade nets.

Treatment
polyhousee1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1e0
Comparator
shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade nete2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“polyhouse recorded significantly lowest plant height (80.00, 114.27 and 172.27 cm at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield (2.87 kg plant-1 and 97.02 t ha-1) as compared to shade house with 35 and 50 per cent shade net”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

STH-801 had significantly highest specific leaf weight compared with STH-510 and STH-39.

Material
STH-801e0
Outcome
specific leaf weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.97, 9.22 and 9.29 mg cm-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“STH-801 was found to have significantly highest canopy temperature, specific leaf weight (7.97, 9.22 and 9.29 mg cm-2 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

STH-801 had the highest canopy temperature, photosynthetic rate and yield among the three hybrids.

Material
STH-801e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.43 kg p-1 and 82.17 t ha-1e0
Comparator
STH-510 and STH-39e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato hybrid, STH-801 was found to have significantly highest canopy temperature, specific leaf weight (7.97, 9.22 and 9.29 mg cm-2 at 45 and 75 DAT and harvest, respectively), photosynthetic rate, yield (2.43 kg p-1 and 82.17 t ha-1) as compared to STH-510 and STH-39.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under polyhouse conditions STH-801 had optimal height and higher light transmission, canopy temperature, specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate and yield.

Material
STH-801e0
Outcome
higher light transmission ratio, canopy temperature, specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Setting
polyhouse conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“STH-801 showed optimum height, higher light transmission ratio, canopy temperature, specific leaf weight, photosynthetic rate and yield under polyhouse condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.