Paper · 2018 · Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica

Effects of Metal Oxides and Urea Fertilizer on Agronomic Traits of Safflower

M. Janmohammadi; M. Fattahi; N. Sabaghnia; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In Mediterranean semi-arid regions major constraints impinging on agricultural development are deficiency of water and nutrient depleted soils. The problem of enhancing crop yield in these areas is widely distinguished as a challenge. In order to evaluate the integrated application of urea fertilizer (0, 160, and 320 kg ha −1 ) and nano-metal oxide (Fe 2 O 3 , ZnO, and CuO) on safflower growth performance, a field experiment was carried out in the Baneh district, a semi-arid region in Western Iran. Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%), plant dry weight (35%), number of secondary branches (16%), seeds number per head (19%), and total seed yield (38%). However, the higher application of urea fertilizer resulted in a significant decrease in wrinkled seed percentage (3.25%), harvest index (2.62%), and thousand seed weight (2.67%). Also, nano-metal oxides significantly affected morphological traits and yield components. Mean comparison revealed that the best performance was obtained by the integrated application of 320 kg urea fertilizer and nano-Fe or nano-Zn. Overall, the present research highlighted the necessity of balanced and integrated application of macronutrients and micronutrient fertilizers for sustainable safflower production in semi-arid regions of Western Iran.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased safflower plant height by 11%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased safflower canopy width by 8%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
canopy widthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–594 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased safflower ground cover percentage by 6%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
ground cover percentagee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–624 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased safflower plant dry weight by 35%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
plant dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
35%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%), plant dry weight (35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased the number of secondary branches of safflower by 16%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
number of secondary branchese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%), plant dry weight (35%), number of secondary branches (16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–684 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased the number of seeds per head of safflower by 19%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
seeds number per heade1
Direction
increasede1
Value
19%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%), plant dry weight (35%), number of secondary branches (16%), seeds number per head (19%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–713 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilizer significantly increased total seed yield of safflower by 38%.

Treatment
Urea fertilizere1
Outcome
total seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Urea fertilizer significantly increased the plant height (11%), canopy width (8%), ground cover percentage (6%), plant dry weight (35%), number of secondary branches (16%), seeds number per head (19%), and total seed yield (38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–741 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher urea application significantly decreased the wrinkled seed percentage of safflower by 3.25%.

Treatment
higher application of urea fertilizere1
Outcome
wrinkled seed percentagee1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
3.25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher application of urea fertilizer resulted in a significant decrease in wrinkled seed percentage (3.25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–864 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher urea application significantly decreased the harvest index of safflower by 2.62%.

Treatment
higher application of urea fertilizere1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
2.62%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher application of urea fertilizer resulted in a significant decrease in wrinkled seed percentage (3.25%), harvest index (2.62%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–887 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher urea application significantly decreased the thousand seed weight of safflower by 2.67%.

Treatment
higher application of urea fertilizere1
Outcome
thousand seed weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
2.67%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the higher application of urea fertilizer resulted in a significant decrease in wrinkled seed percentage (3.25%), harvest index (2.62%), and thousand seed weight (2.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–921 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-metal oxides significantly affected morphological traits and yield components of safflower.

Treatment
nano-metal oxidese1
Outcome
morphological traits and yield componentse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Also, nano-metal oxides significantly affected morphological traits and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated application of 320 kg urea fertilizer with nano-Fe or nano-Zn gave the best safflower performance.

Treatment
integrated application of 320 kg urea fertilizer and nano-Fe or nano-Zne1
Outcome
best performancee1
Direction
best performancee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Mean comparison revealed that the best performance was obtained by the integrated application of 320 kg urea fertilizer and nano-Fe or nano-Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1155 · show in text ↑
e2

“on safflower growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–417 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced and integrated macronutrient and micronutrient fertilizer application is recommended for sustainable safflower production in semi-arid Western Iran.

Treatment
balanced and integrated application of macronutrients and micronutrient fertilizerse1
Outcome
sustainable safflower productione1
Setting
semi-arid regions of Western Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the necessity of balanced and integrated application of macronutrients and micronutrient fertilizers for sustainable safflower production in semi-arid regions of Western Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1373 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

72 papers: 71 positive, 1 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.