Paper · 2018 · Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management

Improving mungbean growth in a semiarid dryland system with agricultural waste biochars and cattle manure

Roberto I C O Taolin; Arnoldus Klau Berek; Eduardus Y Neonbeni; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Mungbean ( Vigna radiata L.) productivity in dryland decreased recently due to the soil fertility degradation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of biochar types and cattle manure rates on the growth of mungbean in semi-arid dark soil. The factorial completely randomized block design 3 x 5 with four replicates was set to arrange treatments for the field trial. Two biochars (rice husk and sawdust) at 10 t/ha in combination with four rates of cattle manure (1, 3, 5 and 10 t/ha) and control (without biochar and cattle manure) were applied to the soil, incubated for three weeks and then planted with mungbean cv. Fore Belu. The results revealed that additions of biochar and cattle manure increased soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity by 2-4% and 0.15-0.20, respectively; decreased soil temperature and bulk density by 1-2 o C and 0.2 g/cm 3 , respectively; increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control. The best growth of mungbean was obtained from the additions of sawdust biochar at 10 t/ha and cattle manure at 3 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased soil moisture by 2-4%.

Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2-4%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure increased soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity by 2-4% and 0.15-0.20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased soil electrical conductivity by 0.15-0.20.

Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
soil electrical conductivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.15-0.20e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure increased soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity by 2-4% and 0.15-0.20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure decreased soil temperature by 1-2 o C.

Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
soil temperaturee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
1-2 o Ce1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased soil temperature and bulk density by 1-2 o C and 0.2 g/cm 3 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure decreased bulk density by 0.2 g/cm 3.

Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
bulk densitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
0.2 g/cm 3e1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased soil temperature and bulk density by 1-2 o C and 0.2 g/cm 3 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased plant height by 4 cm versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased stem diameter by 0.1 cm versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
stem diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.1 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased root length by 5 cm versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased total dry weight by 7 g versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
dry weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7 ge1
Qualifier
totale1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased shoot dry weight by 0.9 g versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
dry weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.9 ge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and cattle manure increased root dry weight by 6 g versus control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
additions of biochar and cattle manuree0
Outcome
root dry weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6 ge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e0

“additions of biochar and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, stem diameter, root length, total, shoot and root dry weights by 4 cm, 0.1 cm, 5 cm, 7 g, 0.9 g and 6 g, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sawdust biochar at 10 t/ha plus cattle manure at 3 t/ha produced the best mungbean growth.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
sawdust biochar at 10 t/ha and cattle manure at 3 t/hae0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best growth of mungbean was obtained from the additions of sawdust biochar at 10 t/ha and cattle manure at 3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1179 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

biochar · soil: physics · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.