Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Physical Properties & Nutrients Content and Uptake of Summer Green Gram

R. R. Kharadi; K. P. Bhuriya; V. P. Bamaniya; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigation was carried out during summer season to know the effect of different organic and inorganic fertilizers on physicochemical properties of soil & content and uptake of plants. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design (FRBD) followed by twelve treatments with four replications. Water holding capacity, bulk density, porosity of soil was not significantly influenced by application of organic and inorganic fertilizers at harvest. Application of vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher nitrogen content & uptake in seed and stover and potassium content in stover of green gram which was at par with incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1 but phosphorus content & uptake was not significantly influenced by either incorporation of FYM or vermicompost or inorganic fertilizer. The use of 100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1) resulted in significantly higher uptake of nitrogen and potassium by seed, stover and total uptake by crop and were at par with the application of 75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1). Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content & uptake in seed, stover and total uptake of green gram was significantly higher recorded with the incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1 which was at par with application of vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1. Application of farm yard manure @ 4 t ha-1 or vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1 along with inorganic fertilizers @ 75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1) is best suited for improving physico-chemical properties of soil and nutrients content & uptake of green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and inorganic fertilizers did not significantly influence water holding capacity, bulk density or porosity of the soil at harvest.

Treatment
organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
Water holding capacity, bulk density, porosity of soile1
Direction
not significantly influencede1
Qualifier
at harveste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water holding capacity, bulk density, porosity of soil was not significantly influenced by application of organic and inorganic fertilizers at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 1.0 t ha-1 significantly increased nitrogen content and uptake in seed and stover of green gram.

Organ / stage
seed and stovere2
Treatment
vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1e2
Outcome
nitrogen content & uptakee2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher nitrogen content & uptake in seed and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 1.0 t ha-1 significantly increased potassium content in stover of green gram.

Organ / stage
stovere3
Treatment
vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1e2
Outcome
potassium contente3
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher nitrogen content & uptake in seed and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–584 · show in text ↑
e3

“and potassium content in stover of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of FYM, vermicompost or inorganic fertilizer did not significantly influence phosphorus content and uptake of green gram.

Treatment
incorporation of FYM or vermicompost or inorganic fertilizere4
Outcome
phosphorus content & uptakee4
Direction
not significantly influencede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“phosphorus content & uptake was not significantly influenced by either incorporation of FYM or vermicompost or inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1) significantly increased uptake of nitrogen and potassium by seed and stover of green gram.

Organ / stage
seed, stovere5
Treatment
100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1)e5
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen and potassiume5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“The use of 100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1) resulted in significantly higher uptake of nitrogen and potassium by seed, stover and total uptake by crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake of nitrogen and potassium under 100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1) was at par with 75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1).

Treatment
100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1)e5
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen and potassiume5
Direction
at pare6
Comparator
75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“The use of 100% RDF (20 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 ha-1) resulted in significantly higher uptake of nitrogen and potassium by seed, stover and total uptake by crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–976 · show in text ↑
e6

“were at par with the application of 75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of FYM at 4 t ha-1 significantly increased nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content and uptake in seed, stover and total uptake of green gram.

Organ / stage
seed, stover and total uptakee7
Treatment
incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1e7
Outcome
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content & uptakee7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content & uptake in seed, stover and total uptake of green gram was significantly higher recorded with the incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of FYM at 4 t ha-1 was at par with vermicompost at 1 t ha-1 for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content and uptake of green gram.

Treatment
incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1e7
Outcome
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content & uptakee7
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content & uptake in seed, stover and total uptake of green gram was significantly higher recorded with the incorporation of FYM @ 4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1227 · show in text ↑
e0

“which was at par with application of vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1288 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure at 4 t ha-1 or vermicompost at 1 t ha-1 with inorganic fertilizer at 75% RDF is best suited for improving soil physico-chemical properties and nutrient content and uptake of green gram.

Treatment
farm yard manure @ 4 t ha-1 or vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1 along with inorganic fertilizers @ 75% RDFe1
Outcome
physico-chemical properties of soil and nutrients content & uptakee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Uptake of Summer Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of farm yard manure @ 4 t ha-1 or vermicompost @ 1 t ha-1 along with inorganic fertilizers @ 75% RDF (15 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1) is best suited for improving physico-chemical properties of soil and nutrients content & uptake of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1540 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.