Paper · 2018 · PLoS ONE

Effect of elevated CO2 and spectral quality on whole plant gas exchange patterns in tomatoes

Jason Lanoue; Evangelos D. Leonardos; Shalin Khosla; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In controlled environment plant production facilities, elevating either light or CO2 levels generally has led to increased biomass and yield due to enhanced canopy photosynthesis. Today, advancements in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have made this technology a viable option for both supplementary lighting in greenhouses and a sole lighting source in controlled environment chambers. Our study used tomato plants grown under both ambient CO2 (AC) and elevated CO2 (EC) conditions then exposed them to various CO2 and lighting treatments during both whole plant and leaf level measurements. Plants grown under EC reached the first flower developmental stage 8 days sooner and were approximately 15cm taller than those grown under AC. However, under AC plants had more leaf area while their dry weights were similar. Of note, under EC chlorophyll a and b were lower, as were carotenoids per unit leaf area. Whole plant analyses, under all CO2 challenges, showed that plants exposed to high-pressure sodium (HPS), red-blue LED, and red-white LED had similar photosynthesis, respiration, and daily carbon gain. Under different light qualities, day-time transpiration rates were similar among CO2 conditions. Day-time water-use efficiency (WUE) was higher in plants grown and exposed to EC. Similarly, WUE of plants grown under AC but exposed to short-term elevated CO2 conditions was higher than those grown and tested under AC during all light treatments. Under all CO2 conditions, plants exposed to red-white and red-blue LEDs had lower WUE than those exposed to HPS lighting. Assessing alterations due to CO2 and light quality on a whole plant basis, not merely on an individual leaf basis, furthers our understanding of the interactions between these two parameters during controlled environment production. Principle component analyses of both whole plant and leaf data indicates that increasing CO2 supply has a more dramatic effect on photosynthesis and WUE than on transpiration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 advanced first flowering by 8 days relative to ambient CO2.

Organ / stage
first flower developmental stagee0
Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
first flower developmental stagee0
Direction
soonere0
Value
8 dayse0
Comparator
ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants grown under EC reached the first flower developmental stage 8 days sooner and were approximately 15cm taller than those grown under AC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 plants were about 15 cm taller than ambient CO2 plants.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
15cme0
Comparator
ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants grown under EC reached the first flower developmental stage 8 days sooner and were approximately 15cm taller than those grown under AC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient CO2 plants had more leaf area than elevated CO2 plants.

Treatment
ACe0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, under AC plants had more leaf area while their dry weights were similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weights were similar under ambient and elevated CO2.

Treatment
ACe0
Outcome
dry weightse0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, under AC plants had more leaf area while their dry weights were similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids per unit leaf area.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“under EC chlorophyll a and b were lower, as were carotenoids per unit leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoids per unit leaf area were lower under elevated CO2.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
carotenoids per unit leaf areae0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“under EC chlorophyll a and b were lower, as were carotenoids per unit leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPS, red-blue LED and red-white LED produced similar whole-plant photosynthesis, respiration and daily carbon gain across CO2 challenges.

Treatment
red-blue LEDe0
Outcome
photosynthesis, respiration, and daily carbon gaine0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
under all CO2 challengese0
Comparator
high-pressure sodium (HPS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“under all CO2 challenges, showed that plants exposed to high-pressure sodium (HPS), red-blue LED, and red-white LED had similar photosynthesis, respiration, and daily carbon gain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daytime transpiration rates were similar among CO2 conditions across light qualities.

Treatment
CO2 conditionse0
Outcome
day-time transpiration ratese0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
Under different light qualitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under different light qualities, day-time transpiration rates were similar among CO2 conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown and exposed to elevated CO2 had higher daytime water-use efficiency.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
Day-time water-use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Day-time water-use efficiency (WUE) was higher in plants grown and exposed to EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-term elevated CO2 exposure raised WUE in ambient-grown plants relative to ambient-grown and tested plants under all lights.

Treatment
short-term elevated CO2 conditionse0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during all light treatmentse0
Comparator
those grown and tested under ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“WUE of plants grown under AC but exposed to short-term elevated CO2 conditions was higher than those grown and tested under AC during all light treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-white and red-blue LEDs gave lower WUE than HPS lighting under all CO2 conditions.

Treatment
red-white and red-blue LEDse0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Under all CO2 conditionse0
Comparator
HPS lightinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under all CO2 conditions, plants exposed to red-white and red-blue LEDs had lower WUE than those exposed to HPS lighting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1574 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing CO2 supply had a stronger effect on photosynthesis and WUE than on transpiration in principal component analyses.

Treatment
increasing CO2 supplye0
Outcome
photosynthesis and WUEe0
Direction
more dramatice0
Comparator
transpiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Principle component analyses of both whole plant and leaf data indicates that increasing CO2 supply has a more dramatic effect on photosynthesis and WUE than on transpiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1983 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

co2 · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 59 positive, 16 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.