Abstract
The present investigation was carried out during 2016 at Fruit Research Farm, Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 9 treatments and 3 replications. The treatments were T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent, T2=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.8 percent, T3=Borax foliar spray @ 0.4 percent, T4=Borax foliar spray @ 0.8 percent, T5= 2, 4-D foliar spray @ 10 ppm, T6=2, 4-D foliar spray @ 20 ppm, T7=GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm, T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppm and T9=Control. Most of the fruit and yield parameters were significantly increased in which the highest fruit set was recorded in T5 (42.84%) followed by T4 (42.10%). Decreased fruit cracking (5.07%) was recorded in T7. number of fruits per tree (1162.66), maturity (69.33 days) and fruit yield (26.82 kg/tree) were found to be significant and highest which was recorded in T8 and at par with T7. TSS (18.09°Brix), total sugar (26.13%), reducing sugar (14.49%) and ascorbic acid (38.06 mg/100 ml) differed significantly where T1 recorded the highest and was observed to be at par with T7. Titratable acidity and malic acid however, were not significantly affected. T1 significantly increased most of the biochemical parameters. So it can be concluded that T1 was best for most of the quality parameters. However T7 (GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm) recorded significantly increased total soluble solids, total sugar, reducing sugar and ascorbic acid were found to be at par with highest. As a whole it can be concluded that T7 (GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm) is best for yield and quality parameters of litchi cv. Muzaffarpur under the foothills of Arunachal Pradesh.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest fruit set at 42.84%.
- Material
- Muzaffarpurt0
- Treatment
- T5= 2, 4-D foliar spray @ 10 ppme1
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 42.84%e0
- Comparator
- T4e0
LitchiOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest fruit set was recorded in T5 (42.84%) followed by T4 (42.10%)”
e1“T5= 2, 4-D foliar spray @ 10 ppm”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 produced 42.10% fruit set.
- Treatment
- T4=Borax foliar spray @ 0.8 percente1
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 42.10%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest fruit set was recorded in T5 (42.84%) followed by T4 (42.10%)”
e1“T4=Borax foliar spray @ 0.8 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 had decreased fruit cracking at 5.07%.
- Treatment
- T7=GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppme1
- Outcome
- fruit crackinge0
- Direction
- Decreasede0
- Value
- 5.07%e0
- Comparator
- T9=Controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Decreased fruit cracking (5.07%) was recorded in T7”
e1“T7=GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm”
e2“T9=Control”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest number of fruits per tree, 1162.66, and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppme1
- Outcome
- number of fruits per treee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1162.66e0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruits per tree (1162.66), maturity (69.33 days) and fruit yield (26.82 kg/tree) were found to be significant and highest which was recorded in T8 and at par with T7”
e1“T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppm”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest reported maturity value, 69.33 days, and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppme1
- Outcome
- maturitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 69.33 dayse0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruits per tree (1162.66), maturity (69.33 days) and fruit yield (26.82 kg/tree) were found to be significant and highest which was recorded in T8 and at par with T7”
e1“T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppm”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest fruit yield, 26.82 kg/tree, and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppme1
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 26.82 kg/treee0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruits per tree (1162.66), maturity (69.33 days) and fruit yield (26.82 kg/tree) were found to be significant and highest which was recorded in T8 and at par with T7”
e1“T8=GA3 foliar spray @ 40 ppm”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 had the highest TSS at 18.09°Brix and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percente1
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 18.09°Brixe0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS (18.09°Brix), total sugar (26.13%), reducing sugar (14.49%) and ascorbic acid (38.06 mg/100 ml) differed significantly where T1 recorded the highest and was observed to be at par with T7”
e1“T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 had the highest total sugar at 26.13% and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percente1
- Outcome
- total sugare0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 26.13%e0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS (18.09°Brix), total sugar (26.13%), reducing sugar (14.49%) and ascorbic acid (38.06 mg/100 ml) differed significantly where T1 recorded the highest and was observed to be at par with T7”
e1“T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 had the highest reducing sugar at 14.49% and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percente1
- Outcome
- reducing sugare0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.49%e0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS (18.09°Brix), total sugar (26.13%), reducing sugar (14.49%) and ascorbic acid (38.06 mg/100 ml) differed significantly where T1 recorded the highest and was observed to be at par with T7”
e1“T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 had the highest ascorbic acid at 38.06 mg/100 ml and was at par with T7.
- Treatment
- T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percente1
- Outcome
- ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 38.06 mg/100 mle0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS (18.09°Brix), total sugar (26.13%), reducing sugar (14.49%) and ascorbic acid (38.06 mg/100 ml) differed significantly where T1 recorded the highest and was observed to be at par with T7”
e1“T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
Titratable acidity and malic acid were not significantly affected by treatments.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Titratable acidity and malic acid however, were not significantly affected”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged T1 best for most quality parameters.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T1 was best for most of the quality parameters”
e1“T1=ZnSO4 foliar spray @ 0.4 percent”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Muzaffarpur”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded T7 was best overall for litchi yield and quality.
- Material
- Muzaffarpure0
- Treatment
- T7 (GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm)e0
- Outcome
- best for yield and quality parameterse0
- Setting
- foothills of Arunachal Pradeshe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T7 (GA3 foliar spray @ 20 ppm) is best for yield and quality parameters of litchi cv. Muzaffarpur under the foothills of Arunachal Pradesh”
The same questions in other papers
2,4-D · yield · LitchiResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Gibberellic acid · yield · LitchiResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · quality: phytochemicals · LitchiPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · LitchiResults agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →application · yield · LitchiResults agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.