Paper · 2018 · Bioscience Journal

Interference of volunteer corn in glyphosate resistant soybean and chemical control in different phenological stages

Mariane Pertile; Joanei Cechin; Vinicius Zimmer; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The successive use of Roundup Ready crops may difficult the management of volunteer plants originated from seed losses during harvest. In soybean, volunteer corn plants can exhibit higher interference and cause reduce yield depending on their density. The aim of this study was to quantify the economic threshold level (ETL) in soybean as a function of the competition of volunteer corn and to evaluate the chemical control in different phenological stages of development. The ETL and chemical control experiments were conducted in the field, under completely randomized and randomized block designs with one and three replicates, respectively. The variables analyzed were yield and ETL as functions of the competition of different volunteer corn populations (control, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 32 plants m-2) and the chemical control with acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitor herbicides alone or mixed with glyphosate in different phenological stages of development (V2-V3, V4-V5 and V6-V8) that were evaluated at seven, 14 and 21 days after application (DAA). The results showed higher competitive potential of volunteer corn in which the presence of one plant m-2 reduces the soybean yield in 17%. The ETL ranged from 0.14 to 0.78 plants m-2 and the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations. The use of ACCase inhibitors herbicides alone or mixed with glyphosate demonstrated greater than 85% control in the V2-V3 phenological stage independent of the period evaluated. The effectiveness of all herbicides decreased with application delay with a control level above 87%, in the V6-V8 phenological stage, obtained only for fluazifop and haloxyfop herbicides alone or in mixed with glyphosate at 14 and 21 days after application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One volunteer corn plant per square meter cut soybean yield by 17%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
one plant m-2e0
Interactor
volunteer corne1weedt0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
reducese0
Value
17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of one plant m-2 reduces the soybean yield in 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic threshold ranged from 0.14 to 0.78 volunteer corn plants per square meter.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
volunteer corne1weedt0
Outcome
ETLe0
Value
0.14 to 0.78 plants m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ETL ranged from 0.14 to 0.78 plants m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend controlling volunteer corn at low populations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
volunteer corne0weed
Outcome
control of volunteer corne0
Qualifier
low populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACCase inhibitors alone or with glyphosate controlled over 85% of volunteer corn at V2-V3.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
V2-V3 phenological stagee0
Treatment
ACCase inhibitors herbicides alone or mixed with glyphosatee0
Interactor
volunteer corne1weedt0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ACCase inhibitors herbicides alone or mixed with glyphosate demonstrated greater than 85% control in the V2-V3 phenological stage independent of the period evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide effectiveness fell with delayed application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application delaye0
Interactor
volunteer corne1weedt0
Outcome
effectiveness of all herbicidese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of all herbicides decreased with application delay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At V6-V8, only fluazifop and haloxyfop achieved above 87% control after 14 or 21 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
V6-V8 phenological stagee0
Treatment
fluazifop and haloxyfop herbicides alone or in mixed with glyphosatee0
Interactor
volunteer corne1weedt0
Outcome
control levele0
Direction
abovee0
Value
87%e0
Qualifier
14 and 21 days after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a control level above 87%, in the V6-V8 phenological stage, obtained only for fluazifop and haloxyfop herbicides alone or in mixed with glyphosate at 14 and 21 days after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1777 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of volunteer corn must be carried out in low populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1341 · show in text ↑

haloxyfop · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fluazifop · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

glyphosate · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 70 positive, 6 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

acetyl-CoA · control · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.