Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ACCase-inhibiting herbicides controlled at least 96% of volunteer corn at the 2 to 3 leaf stage at 28 DAT.

A claim from Efficacy of Pre-Emergence and Post-Emergence Soybean Herbicides for Control of Glufosinate-, Glyphosate-, and Imidazolinone-Resistant Volunteer Corn · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACCase-inhibiting herbicides controlled at least 96% of volunteer corn at the 2 to 3 leaf stage at 28 DAT.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
2 to 3e0
Treatment
ACCase-inhibiting herbicidese0
Interactor
volunteer corne0weed
Outcome
control of the 2 to 3e0
Direction
controle0
Value
96e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ACCase-inhibiting herbicides, including clethodim, fenoxaprop plus fluazifop, fluazifop, quizalofop, and sethoxydim, provided ? 96 and ? 85% control of the 2 to 3 or 5 to 6 leaf stage volunteer corn, respectively, regardless of the herbicide-resistance trait at 28 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1375
t0

“Soybean Herbicides for Control of Glufosinate-, Glyphosate-, and Imidazolinone-Resistant Volunteer Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–148

Title

Efficacy of Pre-Emergence and Post-Emergence Soybean Herbicides for Control of Glufosinate-, Glyphosate-, and Imidazolinone-Resistant Volunteer Corn

Parminder S. Chahal; Greg Kruger; Humberto Blanco-Canqui; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2014. doi:10.5539/jas.v6n8p131

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-1dcbacf062fa96515611455080a1f7b392a918fdce18a36690de549610d1e1d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.