Paper · 2017 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

The Effects of Foliar Feeding of Compatible Organic Solutes on Agronomic Traits of Safflower

Mohsen Janmohammadi; Farzaneh Asadi; Naser Sabaghnia; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Safflower is originated from Iran and is tolerant against water deficit stress. However, in semi-arid Mediterranean climate terminal drought and heat stress adversely affect the safflower production. In order to investigate the influence of foliar application of proline (Pr) (10 and 20 mM) and glycinebetaine (GB) (2 and 4 mM) under well and deficit irrigation (37.23° N,46.16° E). Foliar spray of compatible organic solutes started from middle vegetative growth and continued till seed filling stage. Comparison of well irrigated and stress conditions revealed that severity of water deficit stress (SI) was 0.25. Evaluation of growth-related morphological characteristics such as plant height, leaf area, canopy spread and percent ground cover showed that they considerably reduced by water deficit stress. However, foliar application of compatible solutes could somewhat increase growth related parameters. Results showed that water deficit stress noticeably reduced the chlorophyll content, while foliar spray could alleviate the water deficit stress effects when compared with intact plant (non-sprayed plants). The beneficial effect of GB was more prominent than Pr, especially under deficit irrigation condition. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that the best performance under well irrigated condition was obtained by application of 4 mM GB while under deficit irrigation condition the best performance was recorded for plants treated with 2 and 4 mM GB and 20 mM Pr. Overall, results of current experiments showed that foliar spray with high concentration of GB may can significantly alleviate the adverse effects of water deficit stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit stress severity was 0.25.

Outcome
severity of water deficit stress (SI)e0
Value
0.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severity of water deficit stress (SI) was 0.25”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit stress reduced safflower height, leaf area, canopy spread, and ground cover.

Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, canopy spread and percent ground covere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, leaf area, canopy spread and percent ground cover showed that they considerably reduced by water deficit stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar compatible solutes somewhat increased safflower growth parameters.

Treatment
foliar application of compatible solutese0
Outcome
growth related parameterse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of compatible solutes could somewhat increase growth related parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit stress reduced safflower chlorophyll content.

Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit stress noticeably reduced the chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray alleviated water deficit effects on chlorophyll relative to unsprayed plants.

Treatment
foliar spraye0
Outcome
water deficit stress effectse0
Direction
alleviatee0
Comparator
intact plant (non-sprayed plants)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray could alleviate the water deficit stress effects when compared with intact plant (non-sprayed plants).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycinebetaine was more beneficial than proline, particularly under deficit irrigation.

Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
beneficial effecte0
Direction
more prominente0
Qualifier
under deficit irrigation conditione0
Comparator
Pre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial effect of GB was more prominent than Pr, especially under deficit irrigation condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation, 4 mM GB gave the best performance.

Treatment
4 mM GBe0
Outcome
best performancee0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
well irrigated conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best performance under well irrigated condition was obtained by application of 4 mM GB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under deficit irrigation, 2 and 4 mM GB gave the best performance.

Treatment
2 and 4 mM GBe0
Outcome
best performancee0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
deficit irrigation conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under deficit irrigation condition the best performance was recorded for plants treated with 2 and 4 mM GB and 20 mM Pr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under deficit irrigation, 20 mM proline gave the best performance.

Treatment
20 mM Pre0
Outcome
best performancee0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
deficit irrigation conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under deficit irrigation condition the best performance was recorded for plants treated with 2 and 4 mM GB and 20 mM Pr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-concentration GB foliar spray may significantly alleviate water deficit stress effects.

Treatment
foliar spray with high concentration of GBe0
Outcome
adverse effects of water deficit stresse0
Direction
alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray with high concentration of GB may can significantly alleviate the adverse effects of water deficit stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 1 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.