Paper · 2017 · Indian horticulture journal

Effect of rooting hormones (IBA and NAA), Cow urine and growing media on growth, yield and quality of tomato plants propagated through stem cuttings

Sunandini Kachru; Pardeep Kumar; Parveen Sharma; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted with the objective to determine the effects of rooting hormones (IBA and NAA), cow urine and growing media on the performance of rooted cuttings of tomato. The experiment consisted of one tomato hybrid Palam Tomato Hybrid-1, three levels of IBA (50, 100 and 150 ppm) and NAA (250, 500 and 750 ppm), two levels of cow urine (5% and 10%) and two growing media (soilless and soil) arranged in randomized block design with three replications. Treatment CUC2G2 (CU = Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soil) had a positive and significant effect on days to first flowering, days to first harvest, number of marketable fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant (kg) and average fruit weight (g). Maximum plant height (cm) was obtained from treatment RH1C3G2 (RH1 = IBA, C3 = 150 ppm and G2 = Soil). Ascorbic acid content was significantly better in treatment RH2C1G1 (RH2 = NAA, C1 = 250 ppm and G1 = Soilless). Data indicated that there was no significant effect of different treatments on harvest duration (days), fruit firmness (kg/cm2), pericarp thickness (mm) and TSS (°Brix) in tomato fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow urine at 10% in soil significantly affected days to first flowering and harvest.

Treatment
Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soile0
Outcome
days to first flowering, days to first harveste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment CUC2G2 (CU = Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soil) had a positive and significant effect on days to first flowering, days to first harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow urine at 10% in soil significantly improved marketable fruit number and yield.

Treatment
Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soile0
Outcome
number of marketable fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant (kg)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment CUC2G2 (CU = Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soil) had a positive and significant effect on days to first flowering, days to first harvest, number of marketable fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant (kg) and average fruit weight (g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow urine at 10% in soil significantly improved average fruit weight.

Treatment
Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soile0
Outcome
average fruit weight (g)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment CUC2G2 (CU = Cow urine, C2 = 10% and G2 = Soil) had a positive and significant effect on days to first flowering, days to first harvest, number of marketable fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant (kg) and average fruit weight (g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA at 150 ppm in soil gave maximum plant height.

Treatment
IBA, C3 = 150 ppm and G2 = Soile0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum plant height (cm) was obtained from treatment RH1C3G2 (RH1 = IBA, C3 = 150 ppm and G2 = Soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 250 ppm in soilless media gave significantly better ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
NAA, C1 = 250 ppm and G1 = Soillesse0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid content was significantly better in treatment RH2C1G1 (RH2 = NAA, C1 = 250 ppm and G1 = Soilless).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly alter harvest duration.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
harvest duration (days)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect of different treatments on harvest duration (days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly alter fruit firmness or pericarp thickness.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit firmness (kg/cm2), pericarp thickness (mm)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect of different treatments on harvest duration (days), fruit firmness (kg/cm2), pericarp thickness (mm) and TSS (°Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly alter fruit TSS.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
TSS (°Brix)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant effect of different treatments on harvest duration (days), fruit firmness (kg/cm2), pericarp thickness (mm) and TSS (°Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

growing medium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.