Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Production

Role of Foliar Applications by some Safety Compounds and Shading in Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato

Hoda Ahmed

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Egypt, a large number of tomato varieties are grown but most of them lost their potential mainly because of the biotic and abiotic factors. Among these factors, heat stress that is one of the most important determinants of the continuity of the production in the late summer period. The aim of the current study was to assay the role of some treatments in lessening the harmful impacts of high temperatures on production of two commercial hyrids "Alisa F1" and "888 hybrid". The study was elaborated in the open field at El-Baramoun farm, Mansoura Horticulture Research Station, Dakahlia governorate during two successive late summer seasons of 2014 and 2015. The experimental design was in split plot included six treatments i.e., naphthaline acetic acid (NAA) at 2.5 ppm, Purshade (CaCO3) 1%, Kaoline (Aluminum silicate) 2.5% as foliar spray and intercropping with maize through two levels of shading; shade 2 (intercropping with maize at two meters apart at the same side of ridge planted with tomato; shade 3 (intercropping at three meters apart at the same side of ridge planted with tomato). Significant differences were observed between "Alissa F1" and "888 hybrid" tomato hybrids for the majority of studied traits. In general, the mean performance of "888 hybrid" grown under high temperature was better and more tolerant than "Alissa F1". In regard to effect of the treatments, both treatments of shade 2 and NAA gave the highest plant height without significant differences between them. Furthermore, NAA at 2.5 ppm gave the great number of branches per plant over the two seasons. In addition, expressive increase in the leaf area was recorded for all treatments in the second season comparing with the first one, however, the shade 3 treatment gave the highest leaf area over the two seasons estimated by 730.87 cm and 772.8 cm, respectively. The treatment of NAA caused a high and significant increase in the total chlorophyll content over the control during the two seasons estimated by 1.15 and 1.72 mg/g, respectively followed by Kaoline treatment. In contrast, a great accumulation of dry weight was observed with the shade 3 treatment that gave 30.03 % and 30.22%, for the first and second season, respectively followed by NAA treatment. Kaoline caused a significant increase in TSS % compared with the control. High vitamin C content was recorded by the NAA treatment with significant differences comparing with the control. Concerning fruit firmness, shade 3 has a significant effect on firmness over the two seasons that estimated by 30.55 and 30.98 inch/cm2, for the first and second season, respectively followed by Kaoline and CaCO3 treatments. In addition, the foliar application by NAA increased significantly fruit set % that estimated by 13.10 % and 8.83 % for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively over the control. Concerning the total fruit yield, the shade 3 treatment recorded an increase estimated by 10.45 and 10.68 ton/fed over the control for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively as a mean performance of the two years followed by NAA treatment. According to the previous results, it can recommended under high temperature spraying tomato plants by NAA at 2.5 ppm combined with intercropping with maize at three meters apart at the same side of ridge planted with tomato which enhanced different vegetative growth parameters as well as the quantity and quality of fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 888 hybrid grown under high temperature was better and more tolerant than Alissa F1.

Material
888 hybride2
Treatment
grown under high temperaturee2
Outcome
mean performancee2
Direction
better and more tolerante2
Comparator
Alissa F1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In general, the mean performance of "888 hybrid" grown under high temperature was better and more tolerant than "Alissa F1"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 2 gave the highest plant height of tomato, without significant differences from NAA.

Treatment
shade 2e3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
without significant differences between theme3
Comparator
NAAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“both treatments of shade 2 and NAA gave the highest plant height without significant differences between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA gave the highest plant height of tomato, without significant differences from shade 2.

Treatment
NAAe3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
without significant differences between theme3
Comparator
shade 2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“both treatments of shade 2 and NAA gave the highest plant height without significant differences between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 2.5 ppm gave the greatest number of branches per tomato plant over the two seasons.

Treatment
NAA at 2.5 ppme4
Outcome
number of branches per plante4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Qualifier
over the two seasonse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“NAA at 2.5 ppm gave the great number of branches per plant over the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area of tomato increased in the second season compared with the first, for all treatments.

Outcome
leaf areae5
Direction
increasee5
Qualifier
in the second season comparing with the first onee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“expressive increase in the leaf area was recorded for all treatments in the second season comparing with the first one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 3 gave the highest tomato leaf area over the two seasons, 730.87 cm and 772.8 cm.

Treatment
shade 3e6
Outcome
leaf areae6
Direction
higheste6
Value
730.87 cm and 772.8 cme6
Qualifier
over the two seasonse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“the shade 3 treatment gave the highest leaf area over the two seasons estimated by 730.87 cm and 772.8 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly increased total chlorophyll content of tomato over the control, by 1.15 and 1.72 mg/g in the two seasons.

Treatment
NAAe7
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente7
Direction
increasee7
Value
1.15 and 1.72 mg/ge7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e7

“The treatment of NAA caused a high and significant increase in the total chlorophyll content over the control during the two seasons estimated by 1.15 and 1.72 mg/g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–2037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 3 gave the greatest accumulation of tomato dry weight, 30.03 % and 30.22 % in the two seasons.

Treatment
shade 3e1
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
great accumulatione1
Value
30.03 % and 30.22%e1
Qualifier
for the first and second seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“a great accumulation of dry weight was observed with the shade 3 treatment that gave 30.03 % and 30.22%, for the first and second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin significantly increased tomato TSS % compared with the control.

Treatment
Kaolinee1
Outcome
TSS %e1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Kaoline caused a significant increase in TSS % compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2260–2332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA gave high tomato vitamin C content, with significant differences from the control.

Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
vitamin C contente1
Direction
Highe1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“High vitamin C content was recorded by the NAA treatment with significant differences comparing with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2334–2446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 3 had a significant effect on tomato fruit firmness, 30.55 and 30.98 inch/cm2 over the two seasons.

Treatment
shade 3e1
Outcome
firmnesse1
Value
30.55 and 30.98 inch/cm2e1
Qualifier
over the two seasonse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“shade 3 has a significant effect on firmness over the two seasons that estimated by 30.55 and 30.98 inch/cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2475–2583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly increased fruit set of the 888 hybrid tomato by 13.10 % over the control.

Material
888 hybride1
Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
fruit set %e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13.10 %e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar application by NAA increased significantly fruit set % that estimated by 13.10 % and 8.83 % for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2686–2852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly increased fruit set of the Alissa F1 tomato by 8.83 % over the control.

Material
Alissa F1e1
Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
fruit set %e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.83 %e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar application by NAA increased significantly fruit set % that estimated by 13.10 % and 8.83 % for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2686–2852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 3 increased total fruit yield of the 888 hybrid tomato over the control, by 10.45 ton/fed (mean of two years).

Material
888 hybride1
Treatment
shade 3e1
Outcome
total fruit yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
10.45e1
Qualifier
as a mean performance of the two yearse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the total fruit yield, the shade 3 treatment recorded an increase estimated by 10.45 and 10.68 ton/fed over the control for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively as a mean performance of the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2854–3070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade 3 increased total fruit yield of the Alissa F1 tomato over the control, by 10.68 ton/fed (mean of two years).

Material
Alissa F1e1
Treatment
shade 3e1
Outcome
total fruit yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
10.68e1
Qualifier
as a mean performance of the two yearse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the total fruit yield, the shade 3 treatment recorded an increase estimated by 10.45 and 10.68 ton/fed over the control for "888 hybrid" and "Alissa F1", respectively as a mean performance of the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2854–3070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend spraying tomato plants with NAA at 2.5 ppm combined with intercropping with maize three meters apart under high temperature.

Outcome
spraying tomato plants by NAA at 2.5 ppm combined with intercropping with maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alleviating the Harmful Impacts of High Temperature on Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“it can recommended under high temperature spraying tomato plants by NAA at 2.5 ppm combined with intercropping with maize at three meters apart”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3133–3276 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

shade · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

shade · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

shade · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

44 papers: 26 positive, 18 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.