Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Journal of Desert Research

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND SULPHUR ON PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) UNDER NEW VALLEY CONDITIONS

Shoman, Hosam

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for two years at the Desert Research Center (DRC), Agricultural Experimental Station at El-Kharga Oasis, New Valley Governorate, South Western, Egypt, during two winter growing seasons of 2015/2016 and 2016/ 2017. This work aimed to study the effect of phosphoric acid foliar application levels of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 L/feddan (0.42 hectar) and sulphur fertilizer at rates of 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg S/feddan on the yield and quality of chickpea in alkaline soils. Experimental results revealed that yield and quality of chickpea were significantly influenced by phosphorus foliar application, except seed K and S%, which were not significantly affected in both seasons. The maximum values of these parameterswere produced by 1 L/feddan. Phosphorus (P) foliar in both seasons as compared with nil P (control), 1.5 and 2 L/feddan, except P% in seeds was increased with the increase of spraying level of P from 0 to 2 L/feddan in both seasons. The results showed that increasing sulphur fertilization rates from 0 to 200 kg S/feddan caused a significant increase in all yield components and seed chemical composition of chickpea plants under this study in the both seasons. The highest values were obtained at 200 kg S/feddan compared with control treatment (without sulphur fertilizer), this is fairly true in both seasons. Yield and quality of chickpea were significantly affected by the interaction between phosphorus foliar application and sulphur fertilizer. While, percentages of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in seeds have not been affected significantly by the interaction in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus spray significantly affected chickpea yield and quality.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
phosphorus foliar applicatione0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of chickpea were significantly influenced by phosphorus foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus spray did not significantly affect seed K and S percentages.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
phosphorus foliar applicatione0
Outcome
seed K and S%e0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of chickpea were significantly influenced by phosphorus foliar application, except seed K and S%, which were not significantly affected in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported yield and quality parameters reached maximum values at 1 L/feddan phosphorus.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
1 L/feddane0
Outcome
maximum valuese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of these parameterswere produced by 1 L/feddan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed phosphorus percentage increased as phosphorus spraying rose from 0 to 2 L/feddan.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spraying level of P from 0 to 2 L/feddane0
Outcome
P% in seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P% in seeds was increased with the increase of spraying level of P from 0 to 2 L/feddan in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur fertilizer significantly increased all chickpea yield components.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sulphur fertilization rates from 0 to 200 kg S/feddane0
Outcome
all yield componentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing sulphur fertilization rates from 0 to 200 kg S/feddan caused a significant increase in all yield components and seed chemical composition of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur fertilizer significantly increased chickpea seed chemical composition measures.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sulphur fertilization rates from 0 to 200 kg S/feddane0
Outcome
seed chemical compositione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing sulphur fertilization rates from 0 to 200 kg S/feddan caused a significant increase in all yield components and seed chemical composition of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest values occurred at 200 kg S/feddan compared with no sulphur fertilizer.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
200 kg S/feddane0
Outcome
highest valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values were obtained at 200 kg S/feddan compared with control treatment (without sulphur fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and sulphur interaction significantly affected chickpea yield and quality.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
interaction between phosphorus foliar application and sulphur fertilizere0
Outcome
Yield and qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and quality of chickpea were significantly affected by the interaction between phosphorus foliar application and sulphur fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer interaction did not significantly affect seed P, K and S percentages.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
interactione0
Outcome
percentages of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in seedse0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentages of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in seeds have not been affected significantly by the interaction in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–60 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.