Paper · 2012 · Plant Soil and Environment

The effect of different rates and forms of sulfur on seed yield and micronutrient uptake by chickpea

M. Islam

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at two different locations (Barani Agricultural Research Institute Chakwal and farm field Talagang, district Chakwal) for two crop-growing seasons in northern rainfed Punjab, Pakistan to assess the yield and micronutrient uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). The treatments were four combinations of two levels of sulfur (15 and 30 kg/ha) from two sources (gypsum and ammonium sulfate) and a no-sulfur control. Application of sulfur resulted in a significant increase in seed yield up to 17% over control. Ammonium sulfate was a more efficient source of sulfur as compared to gypsum at both the locations. Sulfur application resulted in a significant increase in micronutrient uptake by plant; however effect of sulfur application on soil pH at the end of experiment was not significant. Availability of soil zinc and copper increased with sulfur application at the end of two year experiment. Tissue copper and iron and soil available copper and iron correlated negatively with soil pH. Sulfur should be applied to chickpea grown under rainfed conditions in order to increase seed yield, to improve nutritional composition of product and to enhance efficiency of other fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application significantly raised chickpea seed yield by up to 17% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Application of sulfure0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of sulfur resulted in a significant increase in seed yield up to 17% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate was more efficient than gypsum at both locations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
more efficient source of sulfure0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
gypsume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulfate was a more efficient source of sulfur as compared to gypsum at both the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur significantly increased plant micronutrient uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
micronutrient uptake by plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur application resulted in a significant increase in micronutrient uptake by plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur did not significantly affect soil pH.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
soil pHe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of sulfur application on soil pH at the end of experiment was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased soil zinc availability after two years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
Availability of soil zince0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Availability of soil zinc and copper increased with sulfur application at the end of two year experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased soil copper availability after two years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
coppere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Availability of soil zinc and copper increased with sulfur application at the end of two year experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue copper and iron and soil available copper and iron were negatively correlated with soil pH.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
Tissue copper and iron and soil available copper and irone0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
soil pHe0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue copper and iron and soil available copper and iron correlated negatively with soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–291 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sulfur for rainfed chickpea to improve yield and nutrition.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
Sulfur should be appliede0
Qualifier
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur should be applied to chickpea grown under rainfed conditions in order to increase seed yield, to improve nutritional composition of product and to enhance efficiency of other fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1216 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.