Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Adaptation of wheat to climate change under different crop growing environment

Sunil Kumar; Birendra Kumar; Shashank Tyagi

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field studies with variety K-9107 as normal sowing date variety under four dates of sowing (15 November to 06 December) and DBW-14 as late sowing date variety under five dates of sowing (13 December to 10 January) with one to four no. of irrigations at different critical stages as sub-plot were conducted during rabi seasons of 2010–11 and 2011–12 to study the phenology, accumulation of growing degree days (GDD), helio-thermal unit (HTU) and heat use efficiency (HUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to select the proper combination of varieties, date of sowing and no. of irrigation and proper time of irrigation so that wheat crop could be adaptable to climate change in increasing temperature and scarcity of irrigation water. The grain yield was significantly higher for crop sown on November 15. The significant reduction in grain yield for less no. of irrigation was observed with delayed sowing. The crop sown on November 15 took maximum growing degree days, helio-thermal unit for ear emergence and maturity which was reduced significantly with subsequent delay in sowing time. Results revealed that HUE was maximum for grain yield and biomass for crop sown on November 15 and it was highest for crop with four no. irrigation and lesser HUE was recorded in delayed sowing with lesser no. of irrigated crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was significantly higher for wheat sown on 15 November than with delayed sowing.

Treatment
crop sown on November 15e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
subsequent delay in sowing timee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of wheat to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield was significantly higher for crop sown on November 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–802 · show in text ↑
e2

“The crop sown on November 15 took maximum growing degree days, helio-thermal unit for ear emergence and maturity which was reduced significantly with subsequent delay in sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The crop sown on 15 November accumulated the maximum growing degree days and helio-thermal units to ear emergence and maturity, which fell significantly with delayed sowing.

Organ / stage
ear emergence and maturitye2
Treatment
crop sown on November 15e2
Outcome
growing degree days, helio-thermal unite2
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
subsequent delay in sowing timee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of wheat to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“The crop sown on November 15 took maximum growing degree days, helio-thermal unit for ear emergence and maturity which was reduced significantly with subsequent delay in sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant reduction in grain yield was observed with fewer irrigations under delayed sowing.

Treatment
less no. of irrigatione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reductione3
Qualifier
with delayed sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of wheat to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e3

“The significant reduction in grain yield for less no. of irrigation was observed with delayed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat use efficiency was maximum for grain yield and biomass in wheat sown on 15 November, compared with delayed sowing.

Treatment
crop sown on November 15e4
Outcome
HUEe4
Direction
maximume4
Qualifier
for grain yield and biomasse4
Comparator
delayed sowinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of wheat to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“Results revealed that HUE was maximum for grain yield and biomass for crop sown on November 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1183 · show in text ↑
e5

“lesser HUE was recorded in delayed sowing with lesser no. of irrigated crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat use efficiency was highest for wheat with four irrigations, compared with fewer irrigated crops.

Treatment
four no. irrigatione6
Outcome
HUEe5
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
lesser no. of irrigated crope5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adaptation of wheat to climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
e6

“it was highest for crop with four no. irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1236 · show in text ↑
e5

“lesser HUE was recorded in delayed sowing with lesser no. of irrigated crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1316 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.