Paper · 2018 · Folia Horticulturae

Production system effects on growth, pod yield and seed quality of organic faba bean in southern Italy

Carmine Amalfitano; Diana Agrelli; Carlo Borrelli; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract A research was carried out in southern Italy in order to evaluate the effects of two farming systems (open field, greenhouse) and five transplanting times (27 September, 11 October, 25 October, 8 November, 22 November) on plant growth, harvest precocity, fresh pod yield and seed quality of organic faba bean. Crop biomass and root expansion were higher in open field than in greenhouse. The fourth planting time resulted in the highest crop biomass, whereas the second crop cycle showed the highest leaf area index. Greenhouse crops showed higher precocity than the open field ones by about two weeks, as well as the first transplant; the delay in harvest beginning increased from the second to the fourth planting time. Both fresh pod and seeds yield were significantly higher in open field than under protected environment with the third and fourth planting times. Seed fiber and protein content showed higher values in greenhouse compared to open field and increased with the transplant delay. Seed polyphenols attained higher concentration in open field and with the two earliest planting times. Overall, 25 October to 8 November planting times in open field best fitted the southern Italy growing conditions in terms of pod yield, but the 27 September to 11 October planting times resulted in the highest harvest precocity, remarkably enhanced under greenhouse growing, whereas seed quality was controversial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open field crops had higher biomass and root expansion than greenhouse crops.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
open fielde0
Outcome
Crop biomass and root expansione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop biomass and root expansion were higher in open field than in greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fourth planting time produced the highest crop biomass.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
fourth planting timee0
Outcome
crop biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fourth planting time resulted in the highest crop biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second crop cycle had the highest leaf area index.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
second crop cyclee0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second crop cycle showed the highest leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse crops reached harvest about two weeks earlier than open field crops.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Greenhousee0
Outcome
precocitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
about two weekse0
Comparator
open fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse crops showed higher precocity than the open field ones by about two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first transplant had higher precocity.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
first transplante0
Outcome
precocitye1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as the first transplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–643 · show in text ↑
e1

“Greenhouse crops showed higher precocity than the open field ones by about two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest beginning was increasingly delayed from the second through fourth planting time.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
delay in harvest beginninge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
from the second to the fourth planting timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the delay in harvest beginning increased from the second to the fourth planting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Open field significantly increased fresh pod yield at the third and fourth planting times.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
open fielde0
Outcome
fresh pode0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
third and fourth planting timese0
Comparator
protected environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fresh pod and seeds yield were significantly higher in open field than under protected environment with the third and fourth planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Open field significantly increased seed yield at the third and fourth planting times.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
open fielde0
Outcome
seeds yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
third and fourth planting timese0
Comparator
protected environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fresh pod and seeds yield were significantly higher in open field than under protected environment with the third and fourth planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse crops had higher seed fiber and protein content than open field crops.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
greenhousee0
Outcome
Seed fiber and protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
open fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed fiber and protein content showed higher values in greenhouse compared to open field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed fiber and protein content increased with transplant delay.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
transplant delaye0
Outcome
Seed fiber and protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed fiber and protein content showed higher values in greenhouse compared to open field and increased with the transplant delay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed polyphenol concentration was higher in open field crops.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
open fielde0
Outcome
Seed polyphenolse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed polyphenols attained higher concentration in open field and with the two earliest planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed polyphenol concentration was higher with the two earliest planting times.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
two earliest planting timese0
Outcome
Seed polyphenolse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed polyphenols attained higher concentration in open field and with the two earliest planting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 25 October to 8 November open field planting for pod yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
25 October to 8 November planting times in open fielde0
Setting
southern Italye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 October to 8 November planting times in open field best fitted the southern Italy growing conditions in terms of pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 27 September to 11 October planting as providing the highest harvest precocity, especially in greenhouses.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
27 September to 11 October planting timese0
Qualifier
under greenhouse growinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 27 September to 11 October planting times resulted in the highest harvest precocity, remarkably enhanced under greenhouse growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.