Abstract
Vine decline causes important economic loss in viticulture, especially in longer view. Several causal pathogen were described lately, however little is known about the etiology or epidemiology of these pathogens on grapevine rootstock. It is well known that these diseases affect grafted and rooted grapevines and are not specific to any scion-rootstock combinations. Our aim was to determine what pathogens are presents in the experimental field, especially causal agents of the rootstock decline. Different grapevine rootstocks and scion varieties were tested in our trial. Isolations were made from the wood tissue and pathogenity tests were done with isolated Cylindrocarpon destructans. The possibility of infection during the propagation process was studied as well. Most commonly Cylindrocarpon sp. and Phomopsis sp. species were identified from the examined varieties. Cylindrocarpon destructans was able to spread to apical (shoot) and basal (root) direction from the point of infection with uneven speed. Callus development is not inhibited by the fungi causing the leaf symptom of the vine decline. Shoot development is reduced if unhealthy parts are grafted to each other.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cylindrocarpon sp. and Phomopsis sp. were the most common species identified from the grape vine varieties examined.
- Interactor
- Cylindrocarpon sp.Cylindrocarpone0pathogen
- Outcome
- species were identified from the examined varietiese0
- Qualifier
- Most commonlye0
Vitis
PhomopsisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“The evaluation of grape vine decline pathogens in the experimental field of the Georgikon Faculty of Agriculture in Cserszegtomaj”
e0“Most commonly Cylindrocarpon sp. and Phomopsis sp. species were identified from the examined varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Cylindrocarpon destructans spread from the point of infection to apical and basal directions in grape vine with uneven speed.
- Interactor
- Cylindrocarpon destructansIlyonectria destructanse1pathogen
- Outcome
- spread to apical (shoot) and basal (root) directione1
- Qualifier
- with uneven speede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“The evaluation of grape vine decline pathogens in the experimental field of the Georgikon Faculty of Agriculture in Cserszegtomaj”
e1“Cylindrocarpon destructans was able to spread to apical (shoot) and basal (root) direction from the point of infection with uneven speed”
Claim · model-written summary
Callus development in grape vine is not inhibited by the fungi causing the leaf symptom of vine decline.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“The evaluation of grape vine decline pathogens in the experimental field of the Georgikon Faculty of Agriculture in Cserszegtomaj”
e2“Callus development is not inhibited by the fungi causing the leaf symptom of the vine decline”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot development is reduced when unhealthy grape vine parts are grafted to each other.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“The evaluation of grape vine decline pathogens in the experimental field of the Georgikon Faculty of Agriculture in Cserszegtomaj”
e3“Shoot development is reduced if unhealthy parts are grafted to each other”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.