Paper · 2018 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

RESPONSE OF SEVERAL SORGHUM VARIETIES TO POTASSIUM FOLIAR.

Abood & Salh

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the fields of Agriculture College , Anbar University, (alternative site Abu Ghraib) during spring and fall seasons of 2017, to study the effect of soil and foliar application of potassium (140 kg.ha-1, 500, 1000 and 1500 mg-L-1) on growth and yield of three varieties of sorghum (Lelo, Inkath and Ishtar), The experiment was carried out according to the design of (R.C.B.D) and in order of the split arrangement with three replicates. Results shows, the cultivar Ishtar was superior in most studied characters such as plant height and leaf area ​​148.67, 152.25 cm, 5210, 4767 cm2.plant-1, in two seasons, respectively. The same cultivar gave the lowest number of days (from planting to 100% flowering), also it gave highest grain yield and highest harvest index which was 81.83 days and 4.93 ton.ha-1 and 25.15% respectively in spring season only. While the two varieties Lelo and Ishtar gave the lowest content of proline leaves (2.11 and 0.18 mg.gm-1) in spring and fall seasons respectively. The highest concentration of potassium (1000mg L-1) was superior in plant height, leaf area and grain yield (150.89, 155.78 cm, 5075, 4812 cm2 plant -1, 5.56, and 8.32 ton.ha-1) in two seasons respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ishtar had superior height and leaf area in both seasons.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Ishtare0
Outcome
plant height and leaf areae0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Ishtar was superior in most studied characters such as plant height and leaf area ​​148.67, 152.25 cm, 5210, 4767 cm2.plant-1, in two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ishtar had the lowest days from planting to full flowering.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Ishtare1
Outcome
number of days (from planting to 100% flowering)e0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same cultivar gave the lowest number of days (from planting to 100% flowering)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cultivar Ishtar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ishtar had the highest spring grain yield at 4.93 ton.ha-1.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Ishtare1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.93 ton.ha-1e0
Qualifier
spring season onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it gave highest grain yield and highest harvest index which was 81.83 days and 4.93 ton.ha-1 and 25.15% respectively in spring season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cultivar Ishtar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ishtar had the highest spring harvest index at 25.15%.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Ishtare1
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest harvest index which was 81.83 days and 4.93 ton.ha-1 and 25.15% respectively in spring season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“the cultivar Ishtar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lelo had the lowest spring leaf proline content, 2.11 mg.gm-1.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Leloe0
Outcome
content of proline leavese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.11e0
Qualifier
springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two varieties Lelo and Ishtar gave the lowest content of proline leaves (2.11 and 0.18 mg.gm-1) in spring and fall seasons respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ishtar had the lowest fall leaf proline content, 0.18 mg.gm-1.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
Ishtare0
Outcome
content of proline leavese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.18 mg.gm-1e0
Qualifier
falle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two varieties Lelo and Ishtar gave the lowest content of proline leaves (2.11 and 0.18 mg.gm-1) in spring and fall seasons respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1000mg L-1 potassium treatment was superior for height, leaf area and grain yield in both seasons.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
potassium (1000mg L-1)e0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area and grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of potassium (1000mg L-1) was superior in plant height, leaf area and grain yield (150.89, 155.78 cm, 5075, 4812 cm2 plant -1, 5.56, and 8.32 ton.ha-1) in two seasons respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · SorghumResults differ

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.