Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

LeNRT1.1 Improves Nitrate Uptake in Grafted Tomato Plants under High Nitrogen Demand

Francisco Albornoz; Marlene Gebauer; Carlos Ponce; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Grafting has become a common practice among tomato growers to obtain vigorous plants. These plants present a substantial increase in nitrogen (N) uptake from the root zone. However, the mechanisms involved in this higher uptake capacity have not been investigated. To elucidate whether the increase in N uptake in grafted tomato plants under high N demand conditions is related to the functioning of low- (high capacity) or high-affinity (low capacity) root plasma membrane transporters, a series of experiments were conducted. Plants grafted onto a vigorous rootstock, as well as ungrafted and homograft plants, were exposed to two radiation levels (400 and 800 µmol m−2 s−1). We assessed root plasma membrane nitrate transporters (LeNRT1.1, LeNRT1.2, LeNRT2.1, LeNRT2.2 and LeNRT2.3) expression, Michaelis‒Menten kinetics parameters (Vmax and Km), root and leaf nitrate reductase activity, and root respiration rates. The majority of nitrate uptake is mediated by LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2 in grafted and ungrafted plants. Under high N demand conditions, vigorous rootstocks show similar levels of expression for LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2, whereas ungrafted plants present a higher expression of LeNRT1.2. No differences in the uptake capacity (evaluated as Vmax), root respiration rates, or root nitrate assimilation capacity were found among treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2 mediate the majority of nitrate uptake in grafted and ungrafted tomato plants.

Gene
LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2e1
Outcome
nitrate uptakee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LeNRT1.1 Improves Nitrate Uptake in Grafted Tomato Plants under High Nitrogen Demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The majority of nitrate uptake is mediated by LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2 in grafted and ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high N demand, vigorous rootstocks showed similar LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2 expression levels compared with ungrafted plants.

Treatment
vigorous rootstockse2
Gene
LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2e2
Outcome
expressione2
Direction
similar levelse2
Comparator
ungrafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LeNRT1.1 Improves Nitrate Uptake in Grafted Tomato Plants under High Nitrogen Demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under high N demand conditions, vigorous rootstocks show similar levels of expression for LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2, whereas ungrafted plants present a higher expression of LeNRT1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrafted tomato plants showed higher LeNRT1.2 expression than vigorous rootstocks under high N demand.

Treatment
ungrafted plantse2
Gene
LeNRT1.2e2
Outcome
expressione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
vigorous rootstockse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LeNRT1.1 Improves Nitrate Uptake in Grafted Tomato Plants under High Nitrogen Demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under high N demand conditions, vigorous rootstocks show similar levels of expression for LeNRT1.1 and LeNRT1.2, whereas ungrafted plants present a higher expression of LeNRT1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate transporter uptake capacity, root respiration and root nitrate assimilation did not differ among tomato treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse3
Outcome
uptake capacity (evaluated as Vmax), root respiration rates, or root nitrate assimilation capacitye3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“LeNRT1.1 Improves Nitrate Uptake in Grafted Tomato Plants under High Nitrogen Demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“No differences in the uptake capacity (evaluated as Vmax), root respiration rates, or root nitrate assimilation capacity were found among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1348 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.