Paper · 2018 · Experimental Agriculture

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF WHEAT GENOTYPES TO HEAT STRESS DURING GRAIN FILLING

PARIMALAN RANGAN; AGNELO FURTADO; ROBERT HENRY

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

SUMMARY Climatic change affects global agriculture and is a severe threat to global food security due to variability of the three factors measuring climate change (CO 2 , temperature and precipitation) with temperature being the most crucial one. Wheat is severely affected by high temperatures with reproductive and grain-filling phases being most sensitive, impacting grain number, size and weight. Seed size and weight are the key agronomic traits subjected to artificial selection and involved in the domestication process since the origin of agriculture. Three genotypes Banks, EGA Gregory and Fang-60 with the latter known to be heat tolerant were grown under glass house conditions and subjected to heat stress for 3 days during early- (11–14 dpa – days post anthesis) and late- (27–30 dpa) grain filling stages in a mutually exclusive fashion. The impact of heat stress during early- and late- grain filling on the four major grain characteristics, thousand grain weight (TGW), grain length, grain width and grain thickness was assessed. The tolerant genotype Fang-60 exhibited significantly higher TGW during early-grain filling heat stress than the control possibly due to an ability to exploit the accelerated release of fertilizer under high temperature. Banks and EGA Gregory were moderately tolerant to susceptible to heat stress, respectively, at early- and late-grain filling with Fang-60 being tolerant to both early- and late- grain filling heat stress. This study confirms the availability of significant genetic variation in heat stress response in wheat that might be exploited to adapt wheat to higher growth temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fang-60 had significantly higher thousand grain weight under early grain filling heat stress than control.

Material
Fang-60e0
Treatment
early-grain filling heat stresse0
Outcome
TGWe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tolerant genotype Fang-60 exhibited significantly higher TGW during early-grain filling heat stress than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1166 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat is severely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banks was moderately tolerant to heat stress during grain filling.

Material
Bankse0
Outcome
moderately tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banks and EGA Gregory were moderately tolerant to susceptible to heat stress, respectively, at early- and late-grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1391 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat is severely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EGA Gregory was susceptible to heat stress during grain filling.

Material
EGA Gregorye0
Outcome
susceptible to heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banks and EGA Gregory were moderately tolerant to susceptible to heat stress, respectively, at early- and late-grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1391 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat is severely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fang-60 was tolerant to both early and late grain filling heat stress.

Material
Fang-60e0
Outcome
tolerant to both early- and late- grain filling heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fang-60 being tolerant to both early- and late- grain filling heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat is severely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found significant genetic variation in wheat heat stress response.

Outcome
genetic variation in heat stress responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant genetic variation in heat stress response in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1574 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 255 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.