Paper · 2019 · Agricultural Sciences

Agronomic, Water Productivity and Economic Analysis of Irrigated Rice under Different Nitrogen and Water Management Methods

Abdulai Yakubu; Joseph Ofori; Christiana Amoatey; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The most limiting factors for irrigated rice farming are water and nitrogen. Efficient water and nitrogen management has remained critical for sustainable rice production in irrigated rice farming system. Due to rapid global population growth and climate change, future rice production will depend heavily on developing strategies and practices that use water and nitrogen efficiently. The study therefore set to evaluate agronomic, water productivity and economic analysis of irrigated rice under various nitrogen and water management methods. To achieve the set objectives, field and pot experiments were carried out at the Soil and Irrigation Research Centre, University of Ghana, Kpong in 2015 and 2016 cropping season. The field experiment was laid in a split plot design with water management treatments as main plots and N fertilizer as subplot treatment. The pot experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with five replications. The water management treatments were; continuous submergence (SC), alternate wet and dry soil condition (AWD) and moist soil condition (MC). Nitrogen fertilizer rates were; no N fertilizer (N0), 60 kg N/ha (N1) and 90 kg N/ha (N2). Data such as yield and yield parameters of rice, water use, water productivity, costs and returns were recorded. Results obtained from both pot and field experiments revealed that rice yields were at par in AWD and SC but yields were lower in MC treatment. With N fertilizer, higher yields were observed with 90 kg N/ha. The interaction effect of submerged with 90 kg N/ha gave the highest grain yield. N fertilizer effect on water use and water productivity was ranked as N2 > N1 > N0 while water management effect on water use and water productivity was ranked in this order: SC > AWD > MC and MC > AWD > SC respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yields were comparable under AWD and SC.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
SCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yields were at par in AWD and SC but yields were lower in MC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yields were lower under MC.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
MC treatmente0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
AWD and SCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yields were at par in AWD and SC but yields were lower in MC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 kg N/ha rate gave higher yields.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
90 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With N fertilizer, higher yields were observed with 90 kg N/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Submergence with 90 kg N/ha gave the highest grain yield.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
submerged with 90 kg N/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of submerged with 90 kg N/ha gave the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer ranked water use as N2 > N1 > N0.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
N2 > N1 > N0e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer effect on water use and water productivity was ranked as N2 > N1 > N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer ranked water productivity as N2 > N1 > N0.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
N2 > N1 > N0e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer effect on water use and water productivity was ranked as N2 > N1 > N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use ranked SC > AWD > MC.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
water managemente0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
SC > AWD > MCe0
Comparator
AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water management effect on water use and water productivity was ranked in this order: SC > AWD > MC and MC > AWD > SC respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity ranked MC > AWD > SC.

Taxon
Irrigated RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
water managemente0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
MC > AWD > SCe0
Comparator
AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water management effect on water use and water productivity was ranked in this order: SC > AWD > MC and MC > AWD > SC respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 57 positive, 5 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.