Paper · 2013 · Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science

RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS TO FOLIAR SPRAYING OF SOME BIO-STIMULANTS (YEAST EXTRACT, ARGININE, B12 AND THEIR INTERACTIONS)

Mohamed Ismail; Mohamed Amin

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiments were carried out in season of 2013/2014 at Botanical garden, Botany and Microbiology Dept., Fac. ofSci., Al- Azhar Univ., Nasr City, Cairo, to study the effect of foliar applications of some bio-stimulants (dry yeast extracts, arginine,B12 and their interactions) on growth, total yield, quality and some chemical constituents of wheat plants. Results showedthat, foliar spraying of wheat plants with bio-stimulants especially yeast extract had a significant effect on vegetative growth,yield and quality. Shoot fresh weight of wheat plants were improved by yeast extract at all doses and B 12 foliar applicationduring the first stage. Results showed that addition of any of these treatments has been significantly increased the dry weight ofroots during two stages as compared to the control in almost cases. The contents of pigments of wheat plants showed, significantincreases in chlorophyll a, b, a+b and carotenoids content in response to various treatments. Results indicated that foliarapplication of all these treatments increased amylase activity compared to control during the second stage. Application of yeast(6 g l-1) + B12 or yeast (6 g l-1) + arginine showed the heaviest 100 seeds weight (4.16 and 4.11 g) respectively as a comparedwith untreated plant(2.9 g). Moreover it could be concluded that foliar spraying of yeast (4g/l) +Arg. led to obtain the highestvalues of yielded seeds protein, while the highest values of yielded carbohydrates at yeast (4g/l) +B12 of wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of wheat with bio-stimulants, especially yeast extract, had a significant effect on vegetative growth, yield and quality.

Treatment
bio-stimulantse1
Outcome
vegetative growth,yield and qualitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar spraying of wheat plants with bio-stimulants especially yeast extract had a significant effect on vegetative growth,yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast extract at all doses improved shoot fresh weight of wheat during the first stage.

Organ / stage
Shoote2
Treatment
yeast extracte2
Outcome
Shoot fresh weighte2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
first stagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Shoot fresh weight of wheat plants were improved by yeast extract at all doses and B 12 foliar applicationduring the first stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar B12 application improved shoot fresh weight of wheat during the first stage.

Organ / stage
Shoote2
Treatment
B 12 foliar applicatione2
Outcome
Shoot fresh weighte2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
first stagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Shoot fresh weight of wheat plants were improved by yeast extract at all doses and B 12 foliar applicationduring the first stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding the bio-stimulant treatments significantly increased root dry weight of wheat over two stages compared with the control in almost all cases.

Organ / stage
rootse3
Treatment
addition of any of these treatmentse3
Outcome
dry weighte3
Direction
significantly increasede3
Qualifier
in almost casese3
Comparator
the controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“addition of any of these treatments has been significantly increased the dry weight ofroots during two stages as compared to the control in almost cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-stimulant treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and a+b content of wheat.

Treatment
various treatmentse4
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, a+be4
Direction
increasese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The contents of pigments of wheat plants showed, significantincreases in chlorophyll a, b, a+b and carotenoids content in response to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-stimulant treatments significantly increased carotenoid content of wheat.

Treatment
various treatmentse4
Outcome
carotenoids contente4
Direction
increasese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The contents of pigments of wheat plants showed, significantincreases in chlorophyll a, b, a+b and carotenoids content in response to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of all bio-stimulant treatments increased amylase activity of wheat compared with control during the second stage.

Treatment
all these treatmentse5
Outcome
amylase activitye5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
during the second stagee5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“foliarapplication of all these treatments increased amylase activity compared to control during the second stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast (6 g/l) with B12 gave the heaviest 100 seed weight of wheat, 4.16 g.

Treatment
yeast(6 g l-1) + B12e6
Outcome
100 seeds weighte6
Direction
heavieste6
Value
4.16e6
Qualifier
2.9 ge6
Comparator
untreated plante6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of yeast(6 g l-1) + B12 or yeast (6 g l-1) + arginine showed the heaviest 100 seeds weight (4.16 and 4.11 g) respectively as a comparedwith untreated plant(2.9 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast (6 g/l) with arginine gave the heaviest 100 seed weight of wheat, 4.11 g.

Treatment
yeast (6 g l-1) + argininee6
Outcome
100 seeds weighte6
Direction
heavieste6
Value
4.11e6
Qualifier
2.9 ge6
Comparator
untreated plante6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of yeast(6 g l-1) + B12 or yeast (6 g l-1) + arginine showed the heaviest 100 seeds weight (4.16 and 4.11 g) respectively as a comparedwith untreated plant(2.9 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of yeast (4 g/l) with arginine gave the highest yielded seed protein in wheat.

Treatment
yeast (4g/l) +Arge7
Outcome
yielded seeds proteine7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e7

“foliar spraying of yeast (4g/l) +Arg. led to obtain the highestvalues of yielded seeds protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast (4 g/l) with B12 gave the highest yielded carbohydrates in wheat.

Treatment
yeast (4g/l) +B12e0
Outcome
yielded carbohydratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the highest values of yielded carbohydrates at yeast (4g/l) +B12 of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1515 · show in text ↑

arginine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.