Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Field-grown transgenic wheat expressing the sunflower geneHaHB4significantly outyields the wild type

Fernanda Gabriela González; Matías Capella; Karina Fabiana Ribichich; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
123
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

HaHB4 is a sunflower transcription factor belonging to the homeodomain-leucine zipper I family whose ectopic expression in Arabidopsis triggers drought tolerance. The use of PCR to clone the HaHB4 coding sequence for wheat transformation caused unprogrammed mutations producing subtle differences in its activation ability in yeast. Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4 were tested in 37 field experiments. A selected transgenic line yielded 6% more (P<0.001) and had 9.4% larger water use efficiency (P<0.02) than its control across the evaluated environments. Differences in grain yield between cultivars were explained by the 8% improvement in grain number per square meter (P<0.0001), and were more pronounced in stress (16% benefit) than in non-stress conditions (3% benefit), reaching a maximum of 97% in one of the driest environments. Increased grain number per square meter of transgenic plants was accompanied by positive trends in spikelet numbers per spike, tillers per plant, and fertile florets per plant. The gene transcripts associated with abiotic stress showed that HaHB4's action was not dependent on the response triggered either by RD19 or by DREB1a, traditional candidates related to water deficit responses. HaHB4 enabled wheat to show some of the benefits of a species highly adapted to water scarcity, especially in marginal regions characterized by frequent droughts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR cloning caused mutations in HaHB4 that altered yeast activation ability.

Gene
HaHB4e0
Outcome
subtle differences in its activation ability in yeaste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of PCR to clone the HaHB4 coding sequence for wheat transformation caused unprogrammed mutations producing subtle differences in its activation ability in yeast.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected transgenic wheat line yielded 6% more than control across field environments.

Material
selected transgenic linee0
Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Gene
HaHB4e1
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
its controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A selected transgenic line yielded 6% more (P<0.001) and had 9.4% larger water use efficiency (P<0.02) than its control across the evaluated environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected line had 9.4% greater water use efficiency than control.

Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Gene
HaHB4e1
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
largere0
Value
9.4%e0
Comparator
its controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A selected transgenic line yielded 6% more (P<0.001) and had 9.4% larger water use efficiency (P<0.02) than its control across the evaluated environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number per square meter improved by 8%.

Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Outcome
grain number per square metere0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in grain yield between cultivars were explained by the 8% improvement in grain number per square meter (P<0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield benefit was 16% under stress.

Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
stresse0
Comparator
non-stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more pronounced in stress (16% benefit) than in non-stress conditions (3% benefit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield benefit was 3% under non-stress conditions.

Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
benefite0
Value
3%e0
Qualifier
non-stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress (16% benefit) than in non-stress conditions (3% benefit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield benefit reached 97% in one of the driest environments.

Treatment
Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4e1
Outcome
maximume0
Direction
maximume0
Value
97%e0
Qualifier
one of the driest environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reaching a maximum of 97% in one of the driest environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic plants showed positive trends in spikelets per spike, tillers per plant, and fertile florets per plant.

Outcome
spikelet numbers per spike, tillers per plant, and fertile florets per plante0
Direction
positive trendse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased grain number per square meter of transgenic plants was accompanied by positive trends in spikelet numbers per spike, tillers per plant, and fertile florets per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1042 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HaHB4 action was independent of responses triggered by RD19 and DREB1a.

Gene
HaHB4e0
Outcome
HaHB4's actione0
Direction
not dependente0
Qualifier
response triggered either by RD19 or by DREB1ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HaHB4's action was not dependent on the response triggered either by RD19 or by DREB1a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic wheat plants carrying a mutated version of HaHB4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–392 · show in text ↑

transgenic · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.