Paper · 2019 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Cover crop potential of winter oilseed crops in the Northern U.S. Corn Belt

Ronghao Liu; M. Scott Wells; Axel Garcia y Garcia

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Winter camelina [WC, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] and field pennycress (FP, Thlaspi arvense L.) are emerging oilseed crops in corn–soybean rotations, but little is known about their cover crop potential. A 2-year study was conducted in Minnesota, USA to evaluate the effect of winter oilseed crops on nitrogen (N) use, growth and yield of corn and soybean. Treatments included WC, FP, winter rye (WR, Secale cereale L.), and a no cover crop (NC) control. Oilseed crops produced 40–50% less spring biomass and accumulated less N compared to WR. The tissue-N of WC and FP was 39.0% and 6.6% higher than WR, respectively. The C:N ratio of cover crops was lower than 20:1, suggesting rapid decomposition. Compared with NC, cover crops lowered soil nitrate before major crops planting, but the post-harvest N profile following corn and soybean was not affected. Compared with NC, cover crops significantly decreased corn yield, with 8.7%, 9.5% and 9.8% reduction following WC, FP and WR, respectively. Cover crops did not affect growth, yield and N uptake of soybean. Oilseed crops showed potential to improve N cycling in the rotation, but more research of their impact on major crops is needed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter oilseeds produced 40–50% less spring biomass than winter rye.

Taxon
Camelina sativa (L.) CrantzCamelina sativae1
Outcome
spring biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
40–50%e0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oilseed crops produced 40–50% less spring biomass and accumulated less N compared to WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–542 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter camelina [WC, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] and field pennycress (FP, Thlaspi arvense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter oilseeds accumulated less nitrogen than winter rye.

Taxon
Thlaspi arvense L.Thlaspi arvensee1
Outcome
accumulated less Ne0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oilseed crops produced 40–50% less spring biomass and accumulated less N compared to WR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–542 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pennycress (FP, Thlaspi arvense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelina tissue nitrogen was 39.0% higher than winter rye.

Taxon
Camelina sativa (L.) CrantzCamelina sativae1
Outcome
tissue-Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
39.0%e0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tissue-N of WC and FP was 39.0% and 6.6% higher than WR, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter camelina [WC, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pennycress tissue nitrogen was 6.6% higher than winter rye.

Taxon
Thlaspi arvense L.Thlaspi arvensee1
Outcome
tissue-Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.6%e0
Comparator
WRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tissue-N of WC and FP was 39.0% and 6.6% higher than WR, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pennycress (FP, Thlaspi arvense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop carbon to nitrogen ratios were below 20:1.

Taxon
Camelina sativa (L.) CrantzCamelina sativae1
Outcome
C:N ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20:1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C:N ratio of cover crops was lower than 20:1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter camelina [WC, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops lowered soil nitrate before corn and soybean planting.

Treatment
cover cropse0
Outcome
soil nitratee0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NC, cover crops lowered soil nitrate before major crops planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and yield of corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops did not affect post harvest nitrogen profile after corn and soybean.

Treatment
cover cropse1
Outcome
post-harvest N profilee0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
NCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the post-harvest N profile following corn and soybean was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with NC, cover crops lowered soil nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter camelina reduced corn yield by 8.7% relative to no cover crop.

Treatment
WCe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.7%e0
Comparator
NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NC, cover crops significantly decreased corn yield, with 8.7%, 9.5% and 9.8% reduction following WC, FP and WR, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter camelina [WC, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pennycress reduced corn yield by 9.5% relative to no cover crop.

Treatment
FPe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9.5%e0
Comparator
NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NC, cover crops significantly decreased corn yield, with 8.7%, 9.5% and 9.8% reduction following WC, FP and WR, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter rye reduced corn yield by 9.8% relative to no cover crop.

Treatment
WRe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9.8%e0
Comparator
NCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NC, cover crops significantly decreased corn yield, with 8.7%, 9.5% and 9.8% reduction following WC, FP and WR, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops did not affect soybean growth, yield or nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Cover cropse0
Outcome
growth, yield and N uptakee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
NCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crops did not affect growth, yield and N uptake of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1061 · show in text ↑
e1

“no cover crop (NC) control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–453 · show in text ↑

cover crop · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

cover crop · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 33 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.