Paper · 2019 · South African Journal of Botany

Physiological and compensatory growth responses of Jatropha curcas (L.) seedlings to simulated herbivory and drought stress

A.D. Lama; T. Klemola; E. Tyystjärvi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We investigated the physiological and growth responses of Jatropha curcas (L.) seedlings to simulated herbivory stress at different levels of drought stress in experimental greenhouse conditions. Simulated herbivory stress had an effect on photosystem II (PSII) yield of seedlings. The highest decrease of mean PSII yield (63 %) was recorded in seedlings grown under severe drought stress (200 mm yr−1) whereas a moderate herbivory stress (25 %) showed positive effects on mean PSII yield of the seedlings grown under well-watered conditions (1,900 mm yr−1). Stem water content, stem dry biomass and root–shoot ratio (with or without leaves) were significantly affected by the interaction effect of the simulated herbivory and drought stress. Simulated herbivory stress had effects on both root biomass and autumnal height growth rate. The highest above- and below-ground biomasses were obtained in the undamaged and well-watered (1,900 mm yr− 1) seedlings, whereas the lowest above- and below-ground biomass were obtained in seedlings exposed to 25 % herbivory stress and grown in extreme drought stress (200 mm yr− 1). Our results showed that J. curcas seedlings exhibited under-compensatory growth responses to simulated herbivory stress in all drought stress levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated herbivory affected seedling PSII yield.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
Simulated herbivory stresse0
Outcome
Simulated herbivory stress had an effect on photosystem II (PSII) yield of seedlings.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated herbivory stress had an effect on photosystem II (PSII) yield of seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, mean PSII yield decreased by as much as 63%.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
severe drought stress (200 mm yr−1)e0
Outcome
The highest decrease of mean PSII yield (63 %) was recorded in seedlings grown under severe drought stress (200 mm yr−1)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
63 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest decrease of mean PSII yield (63 %) was recorded in seedlings grown under severe drought stress (200 mm yr−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate simulated herbivory improved mean PSII yield under well watered conditions.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
moderate herbivory stress (25 %)e0
Outcome
a moderate herbivory stress (25 %) showed positive effects on mean PSII yield of the seedlings grown under well-watered conditions (1,900 mm yr−1).e0
Qualifier
well-watered conditions (1,900 mm yr−1)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a moderate herbivory stress (25 %) showed positive effects on mean PSII yield of the seedlings grown under well-watered conditions (1,900 mm yr−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbivory by drought interaction significantly affected stem water content, stem dry biomass and root shoot ratio.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
simulated herbivory and drought stresse0
Outcome
Stem water content, stem dry biomass and root–shoot ratio (with or without leaves) were significantly affected by the interaction effect of the simulated herbivory and drought stress.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem water content, stem dry biomass and root–shoot ratio (with or without leaves) were significantly affected by the interaction effect of the simulated herbivory and drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated herbivory affected root biomass and autumn height growth rate.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
Simulated herbivory stresse0
Outcome
Simulated herbivory stress had effects on both root biomass and autumnal height growth rate.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated herbivory stress had effects on both root biomass and autumnal height growth rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undamaged, well watered seedlings had the highest above and below ground biomass.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
undamaged and well-watered (1,900 mm yr− 1)e0
Outcome
The highest above- and below-ground biomasses were obtained in the undamaged and well-watered (1,900 mm yr− 1) seedlingse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest above- and below-ground biomasses were obtained in the undamaged and well-watered (1,900 mm yr− 1) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings at 25% herbivory and extreme drought had the lowest above and below ground biomass.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
25 % herbivory stresse0
Outcome
the lowest above- and below-ground biomass were obtained in seedlings exposed to 25 % herbivory stress and grown in extreme drought stress (200 mm yr− 1).e0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
extreme drought stress (200 mm yr− 1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest above- and below-ground biomass were obtained in seedlings exposed to 25 % herbivory stress and grown in extreme drought stress (200 mm yr− 1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha seedlings exhibited under compensatory growth after simulated herbivory across all drought levels.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas (L.)Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
simulated herbivory stresse0
Outcome
J. curcas seedlings exhibited under-compensatory growth responses to simulated herbivory stress in all drought stress levels.e0
Qualifier
all drought stress levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“J. curcas seedlings exhibited under-compensatory growth responses to simulated herbivory stress in all drought stress levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.