Paper · 2002 · Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society

Food oils reduce postharvest pitting and influence the storage quality of grapefruit

Huating Dou; Robert D. Hagenmaier; Zhiguo Ju; et al.

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of various food oils in reducing postharvest pitting of white 'Marsh' grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) has been studied since the 1999-2000 season. In the first study, 2.3% postharvest pitting was found in white 'Marsh' grapefruit dipped with soybean oil and then waxed. In contrast, fruit treated with petroleum oil (motor oil) and then waxed or fruit coated with shellac wax induced 62.5 and 76.1% postharvest pitting, respectively. There was no obvious difference in fruit decay among the above treatments. In the second study, there was no postharvest pitting in fruit treated with soybean, canola, or corn oil and then waxed with shellac wax. Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit. There were no significant differences in fruit weight loss or decay among these treatments. In this study, fruit internal oxygen concentration was lower in all treatments. However, in the first study 8.4% oxygen was found in fruit treated with soybean oil, which was relatively higher when compared to shellac waxed fruit (5.1%). In the third and fourth studies, oil-wax emulsions were developed and the effect on reduction of pitting was tested. However, oil-wax emulsions did not improve the reduction of pitting. These studies indicate that proper application of food oils can successfully control postharvest pitting of white 'Marsh' grapefruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean oil followed by waxing yielded 2.3% postharvest pitting in Marsh grapefruit.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Material
'Marsh'e0
Treatment
dipped with soybean oil and then waxede0
Outcome
postharvest pittinge0
Value
2.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.3% postharvest pitting was found in white 'Marsh' grapefruit dipped with soybean oil and then waxed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petroleum oil followed by waxing yielded 62.5% pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
petroleum oil (motor oil) and then waxede0
Outcome
postharvest pittinge0
Direction
inducede0
Value
62.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit treated with petroleum oil (motor oil) and then waxed or fruit coated with shellac wax induced 62.5 and 76.1% postharvest pitting, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shellac wax coating yielded 76.1% pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
shellac waxe0
Outcome
postharvest pittinge0
Direction
inducede0
Value
76.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit treated with petroleum oil (motor oil) and then waxed or fruit coated with shellac wax induced 62.5 and 76.1% postharvest pitting, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit decay showed no obvious difference among the first study treatments.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
soybean oil and then waxede1
Outcome
fruit decaye0
Direction
no obvious differencee0
Comparator
above treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no obvious difference in fruit decay among the above treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“dipped with soybean oil and then waxed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean oil followed by shellac wax gave no postharvest pitting in the second study.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
soybeane0
Outcome
no postharvest pittinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no postharvest pitting in fruit treated with soybean, canola, or corn oil and then waxed with shellac wax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola oil followed by shellac wax gave no postharvest pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
canolae0
Outcome
no postharvest pittinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no postharvest pitting in fruit treated with soybean, canola, or corn oil and then waxed with shellac wax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn oil followed by shellac wax gave no postharvest pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
corn oile0
Outcome
no postharvest pittinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no postharvest pitting in fruit treated with soybean, canola, or corn oil and then waxed with shellac wax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Petroleum oil significantly increased grapefruit pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
Petroleum oile0
Outcome
pitting of grapefruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shellac wax significantly increased grapefruit pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
shellac waxe0
Outcome
pitting of grapefruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased grapefruit pitting.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oile0
Outcome
pitting of grapefruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Petroleum oil, shellac wax, or shellac wax containing 10% vegetable oil significantly increased pitting of grapefruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss did not differ significantly among second study treatments.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit weight losse0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in fruit weight loss or decay among these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit decay did not differ significantly among second study treatments.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in fruit weight loss or decay among these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments lowered fruit internal oxygen concentration.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit internal oxygen concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit internal oxygen concentration was lower in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean oil treated fruit had 8.4% internal oxygen.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
soybean oile0
Outcome
oxygene0
Value
8.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8.4% oxygen was found in fruit treated with soybean oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shellac waxed fruit had 5.1% internal oxygen, lower than soybean oil treated fruit.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
shellac waxede0
Outcome
oxygene1
Value
5.1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean oil, which was relatively higher when compared to shellac waxed fruit (5.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“oxygen was found in fruit treated with soybean oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil-wax emulsions did not improve pitting reduction.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
oil-wax emulsionse0
Outcome
reduction of pittinge0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oil-wax emulsions did not improve the reduction of pitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that proper food-oil application can control postharvest pitting in Marsh grapefruit.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Material
'Marsh'e0
Outcome
proper application of food oilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proper application of food oils can successfully control postharvest pitting of white 'Marsh' grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1422 · show in text ↑