Paper · 2019 · Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Agriculture Sciences

The Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) to Inoculation with the Mycorrhizae and Spray with FeSO4 and Anti-transpirant

Hussein Hammed Abod Al-Umrany; Redah Mostafa Abd-alhussein Al-obidy

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted at one field of the research station (B) belongs to Horticulture Department/College of Agriculture/ Baghdad University during the summer season of 2017 in order to study the effect of the inoculation with the mycorrhizae and spray with FeSO4 and Anti-transpirant (Armurox) on some growth characters and yield of okra Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench. The experiment was lay out as a factorial experiment (2x3x2) in randomized complete block design (RCBD). The three factors used in this experiment included; the inoculation with mycorrhizae (M) (0 and 10 g. plant-1), spray with FeSO4 (F) (0, 0.5, and 1g. L-1), and the Anti-transpirant ‘Armurox’ (A) (0 and 5 ml.L-1). The results showed that the inoculation with mycorrhizae had positive effect on chlorophyll content, dry weight of shoot, total number of flowers and total yield with values of 51.15 mg.100 g-1, 28.73%, 116.12 flower. plant -1, 21.92 ton. hectare-1, respectively. The M1F0A0 combination treatment was superior in total number of flowers per plant (132.90), while the M1F2A1 combination treatment was superior in chlorophyll content, dry weight and total yield with values of 68.23 mg. 100 g-1, 31.82%, and 25.29 ton. Hectare-1, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved chlorophyll content to 51.15 mg.100 g-1.

Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizaee0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
positivee0
Value
51.15 mg.100 g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with mycorrhizae had positive effect on chlorophyll content, dry weight of shoot, total number of flowers and total yield with values of 51.15 mg.100 g-1, 28.73%, 116.12 flower. plant -1, 21.92 ton. hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved dry weight of shoot to 28.73%.

Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizaee0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
dry weight of shoote0
Direction
positivee0
Value
28.73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with mycorrhizae had positive effect on chlorophyll content, dry weight of shoot, total number of flowers and total yield with values of 51.15 mg.100 g-1, 28.73%, 116.12 flower. plant -1, 21.92 ton. hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved total number of flowers to 116.12 flower. plant -1.

Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizaee0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
total number of flowerse0
Direction
positivee0
Value
116.12 flower. plant -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with mycorrhizae had positive effect on chlorophyll content, dry weight of shoot, total number of flowers and total yield with values of 51.15 mg.100 g-1, 28.73%, 116.12 flower. plant -1, 21.92 ton. hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved total yield to 21.92 ton. hectare-1.

Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizaee0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
21.92 ton. hectare-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with mycorrhizae had positive effect on chlorophyll content, dry weight of shoot, total number of flowers and total yield with values of 51.15 mg.100 g-1, 28.73%, 116.12 flower. plant -1, 21.92 ton. hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M1F0A0 combination was superior for total number of flowers per plant, reaching 132.90.

Treatment
M1F0A0e0
Outcome
total number of flowers per plante0
Direction
superiore0
Value
132.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The M1F0A0 combination treatment was superior in total number of flowers per plant (132.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M1F2A1 combination was superior for chlorophyll content, reaching 68.23 mg. 100 g-1.

Treatment
M1F2A1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
superiore0
Value
68.23 mg. 100 g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the M1F2A1 combination treatment was superior in chlorophyll content, dry weight and total yield with values of 68.23 mg. 100 g-1, 31.82%, and 25.29 ton. Hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M1F2A1 combination was superior for dry weight, reaching 31.82%.

Treatment
M1F2A1e0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
31.82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the M1F2A1 combination treatment was superior in chlorophyll content, dry weight and total yield with values of 68.23 mg. 100 g-1, 31.82%, and 25.29 ton. Hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M1F2A1 combination was superior for total yield, reaching 25.29 ton. Hectare-1.

Treatment
M1F2A1e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
25.29 ton. Hectare-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the M1F2A1 combination treatment was superior in chlorophyll content, dry weight and total yield with values of 68.23 mg. 100 g-1, 31.82%, and 25.29 ton. Hectare-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 46 positive, 8 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.