Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College Farm, Raichur on medium deep black soils during Kharif season of 2014 to study the influence on nutrient management practices of pigeonpea in the intercropping system with sesame. The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments. Among the various intercropping treatments, the treatment which received 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesame recorded significantly higher dry matter production, seed yield and yield components of pigeonpea when compared to other intercropped treatments and was found on par with treatments viz., 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 100% RDF to sesame, 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 50% RDF to sesame and 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesame.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1613 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- dry matter production at harveste1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 166.33 g plant-1e1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harveste1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 36.91 g plant-1e1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly more pods per plant (128.69) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 128.69e1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher number of seeds per pod (3.65) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- number of seeds per pode1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 3.65e1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed weight per plant (42.47 g) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- seed weight per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 42.47 ge1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole-cropped pigeonpea produced significantly higher test weight (12.09 g) than intercropped pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole crope1
- Outcome
- test weighte1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 12.09 ge1
- Comparator
- intercropping treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The sole crop pigeonpea produced significantly higher seed yield (1613 kg ha-1), dry matter production at harvest (166.33 g plant-1), dry matter accumulation in reproductive parts at harvest (36.91 g plant-1), number of pods per plant (128.69), number of seeds per pod (3.65), seed weight per plant (42.47 g) and test weight (12.09 g) when compared to the intercropping treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Among intercropped treatments, 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea with no fertilizer to sesame gave significantly higher dry matter production, seed yield and yield components of pigeonpea than the other intercropped treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane2 - Treatment
- 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesamee2
- Outcome
- dry matter production, seed yield and yield componentse2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- other intercropped treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“the treatment which received 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesame recorded significantly higher dry matter production, seed yield and yield components of pigeonpea when compared to other intercropped treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea yield under 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea with no fertilizer to sesame was on par with the 100 per cent RDF treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane2 - Treatment
- 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesamee2
- Outcome
- dry matter production, seed yield and yield componentse2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- treatments viz., 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 100% RDF to sesame, 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 50% RDF to sesame and 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesamee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“the treatment which received 125 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesame recorded significantly higher dry matter production, seed yield and yield components of pigeonpea when compared to other intercropped treatments”
e3“was found on par with treatments viz., 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 100% RDF to sesame, 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and 50% RDF to sesame and 100 per cent RDF to pigeonpea and no fertilizer to sesame”
The same questions in other papers
Sesamum indicum · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →intercropping · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.