Paper · 2019 · Sustainable Agriculture Research

Effect of Soil Compaction on the Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Zea Mays L.

Obafemi Olutola Olubanjo; Mouiz Aremou Yessoufou

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Agricultural mechanization and open livestock grazing contribute to soil compaction and consequently on crop productivity. This study used a greenhouse experiment to identify the effects of soil compaction on the growth, productivity and nutrient uptake of maize plant seedlings grown at three bulk density (1.17, 1.37, and 1.45 g cm-3) and three water contents (0.12, 0.18, and 0.30 g/g soil). Shoot elongation and leaf area decreased significantly by 27.1 and 67.8% respectively at high compaction (P<0.05). Fresh and dry root mass also decreased significantly at high compaction by 39.1 and 37.8% respectively. Increase in soil compaction also reduced the grain yield by 18.8%. The adverse soil conditions created by increasing soil compaction accounted for the reduction in nutrient uptake. Increase in penetration resistance of the soil reduced the plants ability to absorb nitrogen (13.5%), potassium (51.4%), magnesium (50.4%) and sodium (51.5%) whereas the concentration of calcium and phosphorous were higher when soil resistance varied between 3 and 4 MPa. The relationship between root production, shoot elongation, root biomass and soil strength shows that increase in soil strength/compaction was detrimental to maize production. High soil compaction negatively influenced plant ability to absorb minerals from the soil thus decreased the yield performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High compaction reduced shoot elongation by 27.1%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
high compactione0
Outcome
Shoot elongatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot elongation and leaf area decreased significantly by 27.1 and 67.8% respectively at high compaction (P<0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High compaction reduced leaf area by 67.8%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
high compactione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
67.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot elongation and leaf area decreased significantly by 27.1 and 67.8% respectively at high compaction (P<0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High compaction reduced fresh root mass by 39.1%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
high compactione0
Outcome
Fresh and dry root masse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
39.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh and dry root mass also decreased significantly at high compaction by 39.1 and 37.8% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High compaction reduced dry root mass by 37.8%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
high compactione0
Outcome
dry root masse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh and dry root mass also decreased significantly at high compaction by 39.1 and 37.8% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction reduced grain yield by 18.8%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
Increase in soil compactione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in soil compaction also reduced the grain yield by 18.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil resistance reduced nitrogen absorption by 13.5%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
Increase in penetration resistance of the soile0
Outcome
absorb nitrogene0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in penetration resistance of the soil reduced the plants ability to absorb nitrogen (13.5%), potassium (51.4%), magnesium (50.4%) and sodium (51.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil resistance reduced potassium absorption by 51.4%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
Increase in penetration resistance of the soile0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51.4%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in penetration resistance of the soil reduced the plants ability to absorb nitrogen (13.5%), potassium (51.4%), magnesium (50.4%) and sodium (51.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil resistance reduced magnesium absorption by 50.4%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
Increase in penetration resistance of the soile0
Outcome
magnesiume0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50.4%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in penetration resistance of the soil reduced the plants ability to absorb nitrogen (13.5%), potassium (51.4%), magnesium (50.4%) and sodium (51.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil resistance reduced sodium absorption by 51.5%.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Treatment
Increase in penetration resistance of the soile0
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
reducede0
Value
51.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in penetration resistance of the soil reduced the plants ability to absorb nitrogen (13.5%), potassium (51.4%), magnesium (50.4%) and sodium (51.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium concentration was higher at soil resistance of 3 to 4 MPa.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Outcome
concentration of calciume0
Direction
highere0
Setting
soil resistance varied between 3 and 4 MPae0

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of calcium and phosphorous were higher when soil resistance varied between 3 and 4 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorous concentration was higher at soil resistance of 3 to 4 MPa.

Taxon
Zea Mays L.t0
Outcome
phosphorouse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
soil resistance varied between 3 and 4 MPae0

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of calcium and phosphorous were higher when soil resistance varied between 3 and 4 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea Mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.