Paper · 2019 · Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Inter & Active Effect of Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Maize (Zea mays L.) Performance on a Humid Alfisol Southwestern, Nigeria

Michael Rotimi Olojugba; Ibiloye, John Olufemi

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted in 2017 to investigate the interactive effect of the land preparation methods and different rates of nitrogenous fertilizer on maize performance and yield southwestern Nigeria. The experiment was a 3 by 3 factorial; conducted in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in a split plot management with tillage systems (T): Convectional tillage (CT), Reduced tillage (RT) and No-tillage (NT) as the main plot while nutrient amendments (N) rates (0, 50, and 120 Kg N.Ha-1) as sub-plots factor and all treatments were replicated three times. Growth and yield parameters were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). No tillage had the least plant height, stem diameter and stover weight but had the highest grains yield. Grain yield were not statistically different in all the tillage practices at different N rates applied but 60 kg N ha-1 seems best for maize production in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage had the least maize plant height, stem diameter and stover weight.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter and stover weighte0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“No tillage had the least plant height, stem diameter and stover weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage had the highest maize grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
grains yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“No tillage had the least plant height, stem diameter and stover weight but had the highest grains yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ statistically among tillage practices at different nitrogen rates.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tillage practices at different N ratese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
not statistically differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield were not statistically different in all the tillage practices at different N rates applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–851 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 60 kg N ha-1 for maize production in the study area.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
60 kg N ha-1 seems best for maize productione0
Setting
study areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“60 kg N ha-1 seems best for maize production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–918 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.