Abstract
An experiment was conducted in factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with three replications and twelve treatments. The allocation of treatments to the individual plots was done using random numbers in each replication. The corms were planted on 17 Oct. 2015. The treatments consisted of three various spacing i.e., 30cm x 30cm, 30cm x 15cm and 40 x 15 cm and four combination of fertilizers RDF 200:200:200, NPK 75% + FYM 25%, NPK 75% + GM25%, NPK 75% + VC25%. The treatment T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25% performed higher in number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR), days to spike emergence, length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikes (days),days to opening of first florets, longevity of first florets (days). whereas the earliest 50% sprouting, number of sprouts per mother corm, the yield of corms per hectare, number of corms per plant, number of spike per plant and spike yield per hectare recorded highest in Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25% and the treatment T11: 40 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + GM 25% performed best in Diameter of corms (cm) and Weight of corms (g). Treatment T10: 40x15 cm2 +75% NPK + 25% FYM i.e. observed highest in width of leaf (cm). The cost and return associated with the cultivation of gladiolus in the present investigation clearly indicated that the net return Rs.14,28,591/ha and benefit cost ratio (2.89: 1) were highest in treatment T8.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
T12 produced higher leaf number, plant height and crop growth rate.
- Treatment
- T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR)e0
- Direction
- highere0
GladiolusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“The treatment T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25% performed higher in number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 produced higher spike length and floret number.
- Treatment
- T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- length of the spike, number of florets per spikese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“The treatment T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25% performed higher in number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR), days to spike emergence, length of the spike, number of florets per spikes”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had higher days to spike emergence and first floret opening.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“The treatment T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25% performed higher in number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR), days to spike emergence, length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikes (days),days to opening of first florets”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 produced higher cut spike vase life and first floret longevity.
- Treatment
- T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- vase life of cut spikes (days)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“The treatment T12: 30 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + VC25% performed higher in number of leaves per plant, height of the plant (cm), crop growth rate (CGR), days to spike emergence, length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikes (days),days to opening of first florets, longevity of first florets (days)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave earliest 50% sprouting and highest sprouts per mother corm.
- Treatment
- Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- earliest 50% sprouting, number of sprouts per mother corme0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“the earliest 50% sprouting, number of sprouts per mother corm, the yield of corms per hectare, number of corms per plant, number of spike per plant and spike yield per hectare recorded highest in Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave highest corm yield per hectare and corm number per plant.
- Treatment
- Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- the yield of corms per hectare, number of corms per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“the yield of corms per hectare, number of corms per plant, number of spike per plant and spike yield per hectare recorded highest in Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave highest spikes per plant and spike yield per hectare.
- Treatment
- Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%e0
- Outcome
- number of spike per plant and spike yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“number of spike per plant and spike yield per hectare recorded highest in Treatment T8:30cm x 15cm + NPK 75% + VC25%”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 performed best for corm diameter and corm weight.
- Treatment
- T11: 40 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + GM 25%e0
- Outcome
- Diameter of corms (cm) and Weight of corms (g)e0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“the treatment T11: 40 x 15cm2 + NPK 75% + GM 25% performed best in Diameter of corms (cm) and Weight of corms (g)”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 gave the highest leaf width.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“Treatment T10: 40x15 cm2 +75% NPK + 25% FYM i.e. observed highest in width of leaf (cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest net return of Rs.14,28,591/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“the net return Rs.14,28,591/ha and benefit cost ratio (2.89: 1) were highest in treatment T8”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest benefit cost ratio of 2.89:1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”
e0“the net return Rs.14,28,591/ha and benefit cost ratio (2.89: 1) were highest in treatment T8”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · GladiolusPositive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.