Paper · 2009 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of nitrogen on cotton specific fibre strength formation under water stress and re-watering during the flowering and boll-forming stages.

Ruixian Liu; Wenqi Guo; Binglin Chen; et al.

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pot experiments were conducted to study the effects of nitrogen on the cotton fiber strength formation under water stress and after re-watering during the flowering and boll-forming stage in Nanjing Agricultural University in 2005 and 2006.Within each water treatment,three nitrogen levels were imposed:N 0,240 and 480 kg/ha.The results showed that water stress significantly reduced soluble protein content in cotton fiber,increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD and MDA content at the end of soil water stress,but reduced the fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.On the 10th day after rewatering, there was no significant difference of SOD,CAT and POD activity between water-stressed and well-watered cotton. However,MDA content declined,and the fiber thickening related key enzyme activities were still lower than wellwatered treatments.The fiber strength was also reduced.The result of 2-year experiment showed that N 240 kg/ha was the optimal nitrogen application rate for forming high-strength fibre under soil water stress and afterward re-watering because the antioxidant enzyme activities and the fiber thickening key enzyme activities were highest,and MDA content were the lowest,thus leading to the greatest fibre strength.In this experiments,deficient(N 0 kg/ha) and excessive(N 480 kg/ha) nitrogen supply are of disadvantaged to the fiber thickening key enzyme activities and cotton fibre strength.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced cotton fiber soluble protein content.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly reduced soluble protein content in cotton fiber,increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD and MDA content at the end of soil water stress,but reduced the fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased cotton fiber antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and PODe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly reduced soluble protein content in cotton fiber,increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD and MDA content at the end of soil water stress,but reduced the fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased cotton fiber MDA content.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly reduced soluble protein content in cotton fiber,increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD and MDA content at the end of soil water stress,but reduced the fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced cotton fiber fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly reduced soluble protein content in cotton fiber,increased the antioxidant enzyme activities of SOD,CAT and POD and MDA content at the end of soil water stress,but reduced the fiber thickening key enzyme activities of sucrose synthetase,β-1,3-glucanase,sucrose phosphate synthetase,and IAA oxidase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 days after rewatering SOD, CAT and POD activities did not differ significantly from well-watered cotton.

Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
SOD,CAT and POD activitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
well-waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference of SOD,CAT and POD activity between water-stressed and well-watered cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, cotton MDA content was declined.

Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
wellwatered treatmentse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content declined,and the fiber thickening related key enzyme activities were still lower than wellwatered treatments.The fiber strength was also reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, cotton fiber thickening related key enzyme activities was lower.

Outcome
fiber thickening related key enzyme activitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
wellwatered treatmentse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content declined,and the fiber thickening related key enzyme activities were still lower than wellwatered treatments.The fiber strength was also reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, cotton fiber strength was reduced.

Outcome
fiber strengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
wellwatered treatmentse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content declined,and the fiber thickening related key enzyme activities were still lower than wellwatered treatments.The fiber strength was also reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 240 kg/ha gave highest antioxidant enzyme activities under water stress and rewatering.

Treatment
N 240 kg/hae0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 240 kg/ha was the optimal nitrogen application rate for forming high-strength fibre under soil water stress and afterward re-watering because the antioxidant enzyme activities and the fiber thickening key enzyme activities were highest,and MDA content were the lowest,thus leading to the greatest fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 240 kg/ha gave highest fiber thickening key enzyme activities under water stress and rewatering.

Treatment
N 240 kg/hae0
Outcome
fiber thickening key enzyme activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 240 kg/ha was the optimal nitrogen application rate for forming high-strength fibre under soil water stress and afterward re-watering because the antioxidant enzyme activities and the fiber thickening key enzyme activities were highest,and MDA content were the lowest,thus leading to the greatest fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 240 kg/ha gave lowest MDA content under water stress and rewatering.

Treatment
N 240 kg/hae0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 240 kg/ha was the optimal nitrogen application rate for forming high-strength fibre under soil water stress and afterward re-watering because the antioxidant enzyme activities and the fiber thickening key enzyme activities were highest,and MDA content were the lowest,thus leading to the greatest fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 240 kg/ha gave greatest fibre strength under water stress and rewatering.

Treatment
N 240 kg/hae0
Outcome
fibre strengthe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N 240 kg/ha was the optimal nitrogen application rate for forming high-strength fibre under soil water stress and afterward re-watering because the antioxidant enzyme activities and the fiber thickening key enzyme activities were highest,and MDA content were the lowest,thus leading to the greatest fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 0 kg/ha nitrogen was disadvantageous for cotton fiber thickening enzymes and strength.

Treatment
N 0 kg/hae0
Outcome
cotton fibre strengthe0
Direction
disadvantagede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficient(N 0 kg/ha) and excessive(N 480 kg/ha) nitrogen supply are of disadvantaged to the fiber thickening key enzyme activities and cotton fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 480 kg/ha nitrogen was disadvantageous for cotton fiber thickening enzymes and strength.

Treatment
N 480 kg/hae0
Outcome
cotton fibre strengthe0
Direction
disadvantagede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficient(N 0 kg/ha) and excessive(N 480 kg/ha) nitrogen supply are of disadvantaged to the fiber thickening key enzyme activities and cotton fibre strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1519 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

drought · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.