Paper · 2025 · Resources Environment and Sustainability

Enhancement joint fertilization efficacy of straw and nitrogen fertilizer on soil quality and seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming

Qiang Li; Zhitao Liu; Li’an Wang; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Straw return with optimizing nitrogen fertilizer is an important way to achieve sustainable cotton farming. However, quantitative analysis of joint fertilization efficacy (JFE) of straw return and nitrogen fertilizer on soil quality and seedcotton yield remains uncertain. Herein, based on a 7-year field experiment, we evaluated the dynamic characteristics of JFE of straw return and nitrogen rates (75, 150 and 300 kg N ha −1 , denote as N75, N150 and N300, respectively) on soil quality index (JFE-SQI) and seedcotton yield (JFE-Y) in a cotton–wheat​ cropping system of East China. The results showed that straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability. Straw return with N150 could also achieve higher JFE-SQI and JFE-Y synergistically. Meanwhile, JFE-SQI and JFE-Y at N150 had a synergistic effect (JFE > 10%) in the first 5 year while a summing effect (−10% ≤ JFE ≤ 10%) from the sixth year. And the highest JFE-Y could be reached when moderate JFE-SQI was achieved, indicating that there was a nitrogen-driven tradeoff between JFE-SQI and JFE-Y. Moreover, Climatic factor exerted a significant contribution to seedcotton yield and JFE-Y. In conclusion, reasonable straw return and nitrogen fertilizer management strategy is an effective way to realize sustainable cotton planting under the global climate change. • Joint fertilization efficacies (JFE) on SQI and seedcotton yield were quantified. • There was nitrogen-driven tradeoff between JFE-seedcotton yield and JFE-SQI. • JFE-SQI and JFE-seedcotton yield were higher under straw return with 150 kg N ha \protect elax \special {t4ht=−}1 . • Climatic factor exerted a significant contribution to JFE-seedcotton yield. • JFE evaluation was an effective way to determine sustainable cotton farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 reducing bulk density.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
soil carbon and nitrogen sequestratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 promoting nutrient availability.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
nutrient availabilitye0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 stimulating microbial growth.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
microbial growthe0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 enhancing soil enzyme activities.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
soil enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 improving seedcotton yield and its stability.

Treatment
straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150)e0
Outcome
seedcotton yield and its stabilitye0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw return with moderate nitrogen rate (i.e.N150) improved soil quality by reducing bulk density, increasing soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration, promoting nutrient availability, stimulating microbial growth and enhancing soil enzyme activities, thereby improving seedcotton yield and its stability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 produced higher JFE-SQI and JFE-Y.

Treatment
Straw return with N150e0
Outcome
JFE-SQI and JFE-Ye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw return with N150 could also achieve higher JFE-SQI and JFE-Y synergistically.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N150, joint fertilization was synergistic in the first five years.

Outcome
synergistic effecte0
Value
JFE > 10%e0
Qualifier
first 5 yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JFE-SQI and JFE-Y at N150 had a synergistic effect (JFE > 10%) in the first 5 year while a summing effect (−10% ≤ JFE ≤ 10%) from the sixth year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N150, joint fertilization had a summing effect from year six.

Outcome
summing effecte0
Value
−10% ≤ JFE ≤ 10%e0
Qualifier
from the sixth yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JFE-SQI and JFE-Y at N150 had a synergistic effect (JFE > 10%) in the first 5 year while a summing effect (−10% ≤ JFE ≤ 10%) from the sixth year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest JFE-Y occurred with moderate JFE-SQI, indicating a nitrogen-driven tradeoff.

Outcome
JFE-Ye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
JFE-SQIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest JFE-Y could be reached when moderate JFE-SQI was achieved, indicating that there was a nitrogen-driven tradeoff between JFE-SQI and JFE-Y.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Climate contributed significantly to seedcotton yield and JFE-Y.

Outcome
seedcotton yield and JFE-Ye0
Setting
Climatic factore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Climatic factor exerted a significant contribution to seedcotton yield and JFE-Y.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedcotton yield for sustainable cotton farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–141 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Nitrate at 9 meq/liter was less effective for N accumulation relative to vegetative parts.

    Growth of Cotton Plants on Nitrate and Ammonium Nitrogen1 · 1975 · compared with lower concentrations of either source, or their combination

    Opposite direction

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.