Paper · 2019 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Effect of application various combination of fertilizers and manure on sugarcane production and juice quality

Joginder Kumar; Vijay Kumar; Kavita .

16
claims
41
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2016-17 at Regional Research Station, Karnal of CCS Haryana Agricultural University. The experiment comprised of 10 treatments viz. Control (No fertilizer), 50% recommended dose (RD) of NPK, Recommended dose (RD) of NPK, Soil test based (STV) NPK, FYM@15t/ha + 50% RD NPK, FYM@15t/ha + 100% RD NPK, FYM@15t/ha + NPK based on STV, FYM@10t/ha + Bio fertilizers (BF) +50%RD NPK, FYM@10t/ha+BF+100% RD NPK, FYM@10t/ha + BF+ STV NPK. The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control. The application of FYM@15 t ha-1+50% RD NPK achieved the similar cane yield as achieved by the application of 100% RD NPK. The application of FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPK had the maximum cane yield (93.23 t ha-1) and yield attributes parameters viz. germination percentage 44.91 %, cane girth 2.73 cm, cane length 2.97 m, cane weight 0.92 kg, NMC 101399 followed by the application of FYM@10t/ha+BF+100% RD NPK, and these treatment significantly increased cane weight and yield over RD NPK.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased germination percentage over control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.4 to 40.74 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased cane girth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
cane girthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.08 to 2.44 cme0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased cane length.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
cane lengthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
2.28 to 2.67 me0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased cane weight.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
cane weighte0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased NMC.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
NMCe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
91417 to 97223e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“NMC (91417 to 97223)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased sucrose percentage.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
sucrose%e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
16.60 to 18.02%e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended or soil-test NPK significantly increased CCS percentage.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
100% RD NPK or STV NPKe1
Outcome
CCS%e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
11.3 to 12.51%e0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 100% RD NPK or STV NPK significantly increased the cane yield and yield attributes viz. germination percentage (35.4 to 40.74 %), cane girth (2.08 to 2.44 cm), cane length (2.28 to 2.67 m) and cane weight (0.64 to 0.78 kg cane-1), NMC (91417 to 97223), sucrose% (16.60 to 18.02%), CCS% (11.3 to 12.51%) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus half recommended NPK gave similar cane yield to full recommended NPK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
FYM@15 t ha-1+50% RD NPKe0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
100% RD NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of FYM@15 t ha-1+50% RD NPK achieved the similar cane yield as achieved by the application of 100% RD NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave maximum cane yield of 93.23 t ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPKe0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
93.23 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPK had the maximum cane yield (93.23 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave germination percentage of 44.91 %.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Value
44.91 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentage 44.91 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave cane girth of 2.73 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane girthe0
Value
2.73 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“cane girth 2.73 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave cane length of 2.97 m.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane lengthe0
Value
2.97 me0

Verbatim

e0

“cane length 2.97 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave cane weight of 0.92 kg.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane weighte0
Value
0.92 kge0

Verbatim

e0

“cane weight 0.92 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK gave NMC of 101399.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
NMCe0
Value
101399e0

Verbatim

e0

“NMC 101399”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK significantly increased cane weight over recommended NPK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPKe1
Outcome
cane weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
RD NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“these treatment significantly increased cane weight and yield over RD NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPK had the maximum cane yield (93.23 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus full recommended NPK significantly increased yield over recommended NPK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPKe1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
RD NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“these treatment significantly increased cane weight and yield over RD NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of FYM@15t ha-1+100% RD NPK had the maximum cane yield (93.23 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1008 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.