Paper · 2019 · Metabolomics

Comparative metabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae

Kui Kang; Lei Yue; Xin Xia; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
82
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens Stål, Hemiptera: Delphacidae) is one of the most devastating insect pests of the crucially important cereal crop, rice (Oryza sativa L.). Currently, multiple BPH-resistant rice varieties have been cultivated and generalized to control BPH. However, the defence metabolic responses and their modes of action against BPH in different rice cultivars remain uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: We used a non-biased metabolomics approach to explore the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in the susceptible TN1 rice cultivar and two resistant cultivars (IR36 and IR56). METHODS: The metabolomic detection based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed to investigate the content changes of identified metabolites in TN1, IR36 and IR56 rice varieties at various time points (0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 96 h) post BPH feeding. The differentially expressed metabolites were screened and the corresponding metabolic pathways were further enriched. RESULTS: The results showed that compared to that in TN1, the content changes of most primary metabolites were more stable, but the concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolites were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56. Furthermore, the differentially expressed pathways analysis revealed that cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolism was persistently induced in IR36, but changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism were more significant in IR56 during BPH infestation. Besides, the contents of quercetin and spermidine which were harmful to BPH fitness, were significantly elevated by BPH in TN1 and IR36, and the quercetin level was significantly decreased during BPH feeding in IR56. CONCLUSION: The results of the differences in metabolite profiles in response to BPH infestation in different rice cultivars were useful to clarify the metabolic mechanism of rice plants during BPH infestation and to provide new resources to control this insect pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary metabolite contents were more stable in IR36 and IR56 than TN1.

Material
IR36 and IR56e0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
content changes of most primary metabolitese0
Direction
more stablee0
Comparator
TN1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to that in TN1, the content changes of most primary metabolites were more stable, but the concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolites were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56. Furthermore, the differentially expressed pathways analysis revealed that cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolism was persistently induced in IR36, but changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism were more significant in IR56 during BPH infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defense metabolite changes were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56 than TN1.

Material
IR36 and IR56e0
Outcome
concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolitese0
Direction
more acute and persistente0
Comparator
TN1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to that in TN1, the content changes of most primary metabolites were more stable, but the concentration alterations of some defence-related metabolites were more acute and persistent in IR36 and IR56.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanoamino acid and lipid metabolism was persistently induced in IR36.

Material
IR36e0
Outcome
cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolisme0
Direction
inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyanoamino acids and lipids metabolism was persistently induced in IR36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism changes were more significant in IR56.

Material
IR56e0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolisme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism were more significant in IR56 during BPH infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BPH significantly elevated quercetin and spermidine contents in TN1 and IR36.

Material
TN1 and IR36e0
Treatment
BPHe0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
contents of quercetin and spermidinee0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of quercetin and spermidine which were harmful to BPH fitness, were significantly elevated by BPH in TN1 and IR36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BPH feeding significantly decreased quercetin in IR56.

Material
IR56e0
Treatment
BPH feedinge0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
quercetin levele0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quercetin level was significantly decreased during BPH feeding in IR56.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑

infection · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.