Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters

Murk Nizamani; Feroz Gul Nizamani; Abdul Latif Nizamani; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of different drying methods on wheat grain quality, find out suitable storage and drying method. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The present research was carried out to determine the effect of drying methods (Sun dry, Air dry and Oven dry) and storage periods (90 and 180 days) on wheat quality parameters. The differences among the treatment’s means were compared by the HSD test. Findings: The results indicated that hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch decreased greatly in all types of drying methods with the progress of storage period. The maximum hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch were recorded in the sun drying method followed by oven drying method under the storage period of 90 days. The minimum performance of these parameters was recorded in air drying method under the storage period of 180 days, this, may be due to presence of moistness and infestation of insect attacks. The highest values of all the tested parameters except moisture content were observed in sun drying method in the storage period of 90 days. The maximum moisture content was recorded in air drying method, while sun drying method ranked second for moisture content in the seed kept for 90 days. Minimum moisture content was noticed in oven drying method in the seed kept for 180 days. Air drying method proved worst as compared to sun drying and oven drying methods. The decreasing trend of tested traits was noticed with the increasing storage periods. The storage of period of 90 days gave the highest values in various observed traits as compared to 180 days. Application/Improvements: The Sun drying method should be used to store wheat at desired environment where grain could not be under stress and the place of stored grains must be changed after the storage of 90 days. Keywords: Drying methods, Storage periods, Quality parameters, wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness, germination capacity and protein of wheat decreased with longer storage across the drying methods.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage periode1
Outcome
hardness, germination capacity, proteine1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch decreased greatly in all types of drying methods with the progress of storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch of wheat decreased with longer storage across the drying methods.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage periode1
Outcome
starche1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch decreased greatly in all types of drying methods with the progress of storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying gave the maximum hardness, germination capacity and protein of wheat after 90 days of storage, followed by oven drying.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sun drying methode2
Outcome
hardness, germination capacity, proteine2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
storage period of 90 dayse2
Comparator
oven drying methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch were recorded in the sun drying method followed by oven drying method under the storage period of 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying gave the maximum starch content of wheat after 90 days of storage, followed by oven drying.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sun drying methode2
Outcome
starche2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
storage period of 90 dayse2
Comparator
oven drying methode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum hardness, germination capacity, protein and starch were recorded in the sun drying method followed by oven drying method under the storage period of 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air drying gave the minimum performance of the wheat quality parameters after 180 days of storage.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
air drying methode3
Outcome
performance of these parameterse3
Direction
minimume3
Qualifier
storage period of 180 dayse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e3

“The minimum performance of these parameters was recorded in air drying method under the storage period of 180 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying gave the highest values of all tested wheat parameters except moisture content after 90 days of storage.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sun drying methode4
Outcome
all the tested parameters except moisture contente4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
storage period of 90 dayse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest values of all the tested parameters except moisture content were observed in sun drying method in the storage period of 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air drying gave the maximum moisture content of wheat.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
air drying methode5
Outcome
moisture contente5
Direction
maximume5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum moisture content was recorded in air drying method, while sun drying method ranked second for moisture content in the seed kept for 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying ranked second for moisture content of wheat kept for 90 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sun drying methode5
Outcome
moisture contente5
Direction
ranked seconde5
Qualifier
seed kept for 90 dayse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum moisture content was recorded in air drying method, while sun drying method ranked second for moisture content in the seed kept for 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oven drying gave the minimum moisture content of wheat kept for 180 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
oven drying methode6
Outcome
moisture contente6
Direction
Minimume6
Qualifier
seed kept for 180 dayse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“Minimum moisture content was noticed in oven drying method in the seed kept for 180 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air drying proved the worst method for wheat quality compared with sun drying and oven drying.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Air drying methode7
Outcome
proved worste7
Direction
worste7
Comparator
sun drying and oven drying methodse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e7

“Air drying method proved worst as compared to sun drying and oven drying methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage for 90 days gave the highest values of the observed wheat traits compared with 180 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
storage of period of 90 dayse6
Outcome
various observed traitse6
Direction
highest valuese6
Comparator
180 dayse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“The storage of period of 90 days gave the highest values in various observed traits as compared to 180 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1610 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying should be used to store wheat, and stored grain should be moved after 90 days of storage.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Sun drying methode7
Outcome
store wheate7
Qualifier
the place of stored grains must be changed after the storage of 90 dayse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of drying methods and storage periods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e7

“The Sun drying method should be used to store wheat at desired environment where grain could not be under stress and the place of stored grains must be changed after the storage of 90 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1826 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

processing · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.