Paper · 2024 · Grain & Oil Science and Technology

Changes in physicochemical characteristics of wheat flour and quality of fresh wet noodles induced by microwave treatment

Jian Zhang; Xuejie Li; Xiujuan Ren; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fresh wet noodles (FWN) are popular staple foods due to its unique chewy texture and favorable taste. However, the development of FWN is limited by its short shelf life and high browning rate. It has been found that the quantity of original microorganisms in wheat flour produced by traditional method is relatively high, which is detrimental to the processing quality and storage stability of FWN. Consequently, it becomes imperative to decrease microorganisms in wheat flour. Microwave treatment has been regarded as a promising method in the food industry due to its potential in inhibiting microbial growth and inactivating enzymes without causing adverse effect on the food quality. This study aims to investigate the effects of microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 kW) on the physicochemical properties of wheat flour and the quality of FWN. The results revealed that microwave treatment had a significant effect on microbial inhibition and enzyme inactivation, wherein the total plate count (TPC) and yeast and mold counts (YMC) decreased by 0.87 lg(CFU/g) and 1.13 lg(CFU/g) respectively, and PPO activity decreased from 11.40 U to 6.31 U. The dough quality properties, such as stability, extensibility, and starch viscosity, improved significantly under different microwave conditions. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images indicated that starch and proteins aggregated gradually in treated flour, altering rheological properties of dough. From the results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), microwave treatment led to the appearance of disrupted structure in the gluten proteins, but the secondary structure of proteins altered slightly. Rheological properties of dough confirmed that the microwave treatment greatly affected processing characteristics of wheat flour products, with significant advantageous consequences on product quality, especially for textural properties of FWN. Furthermore, FWN darkening could be inhibited noticeably after microwave treatment, thereby prolonging its shelf life. Therefore, microwave treatment could thus be an effective, practical technology to produce low-bacterial flour and thereby enhance its product quality. Microwave treatment decreased microorganisms (TPC and YMC) and PPO activity significantly. CLSM images revealed that microwave resulted in starch and protein aggregation. Microwave changed the gluten protein microstructures and inhibited the darkening rate of fresh wet noodles (FWN) greatly. When power was at 2 kW, hardness of FWN reached the peak. Consequently, the optimum microwave treatment can be conducted at 2 kW for 20 s.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment decreased total plate count in wheat flour by 0.87 lg(CFU/g).

Treatment
microwave treatmente2
Outcome
total plate count (TPC)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
0.87 lg(CFU/g)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total plate count (TPC) and yeast and mold counts (YMC) decreased by 0.87 lg(CFU/g) and 1.13 lg(CFU/g) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment decreased yeast and mold counts in wheat flour by 1.13 lg(CFU/g).

Treatment
microwave treatmente2
Outcome
yeast and mold counts (YMC)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
1.13 lg(CFU/g)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total plate count (TPC) and yeast and mold counts (YMC) decreased by 0.87 lg(CFU/g) and 1.13 lg(CFU/g) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment decreased PPO activity in wheat flour from 11.40 U to 6.31 U.

Treatment
microwave treatmente2
Gene
PPOe3
Outcome
PPO activitye3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
11.40 U to 6.31 Ue3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e3

“PPO activity decreased from 11.40 U to 6.31 U”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dough stability, extensibility and starch viscosity improved significantly under different microwave conditions.

Treatment
different microwave conditionse4
Outcome
stability, extensibility, and starch viscositye4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dough quality properties, such as stability, extensibility, and starch viscosity, improved significantly under different microwave conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch and proteins aggregated gradually in microwave-treated wheat flour.

Treatment
microwave treatmente2
Outcome
starch and proteins aggregated graduallye5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e5

“starch and proteins aggregated gradually in treated flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment led to disrupted structure in the gluten proteins.

Treatment
microwave treatmente6
Outcome
disrupted structure in the gluten proteinse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e6

“microwave treatment led to the appearance of disrupted structure in the gluten proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The secondary structure of proteins altered slightly after microwave treatment.

Treatment
microwave treatmente2
Outcome
the secondary structure of proteinse7
Qualifier
altered slightlye7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e7

“the secondary structure of proteins altered slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave treatment inhibited darkening of fresh wet noodles.

Treatment
microwave treatmente3
Outcome
FWN darkeninge3
Direction
inhibitede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e3

“FWN darkening could be inhibited noticeably after microwave treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness of fresh wet noodles reached its peak at 2 kW microwave power.

Treatment
2 kWe3
Outcome
hardness of FWNe3
Direction
reached the peake3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e3

“When power was at 2 kW, hardness of FWN reached the peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2511–2567 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum microwave treatment for wheat kernels is 2 kW for 20 s.

Outcome
optimum microwave treatmente3
Value
2 kW for 20 se3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“microwave treatment of wheat kernels under different powers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–793 · show in text ↑
e3

“the optimum microwave treatment can be conducted at 2 kW for 20 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2583–2648 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.