Paper · 2014 · Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Productivity and Quality Responses of Salt-Stressed Roses to Supplemental Calcium

Alma R. Solís-Pérez; Raul I. Cabrera

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plants of Rosa × spp. L. ‘Happy Hour’ grafted on the rootstocks R . × ‘Manetti’ and R . × ‘Natal Briar’ were salinized with 12 mM NaCl and received supplemental calcium (Ca) applications (as CaSO 4 ) of 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM. Additional plants were salinized with 6 mM Na 2 SO 4 and supplemented with 5 mM CaSO 4 and compared to non-salinized, no supplemental Ca control plants. Cumulative flowers harvested, shoot length and leaf chlorophyll index were similar for both rootstocks across salt treatments, but Manetti plants had higher dry weights in flowers and most plant tissues except roots. Productivity and water relations in NaCl-salinized plants were not responsive to supplemental Ca. Conversely, calcium-supplemented plants salinized with Na 2 SO 4 had better productivity and quality than those with NaCl, and were similar to non-stressed control plants. Salt injury symptoms were evident only on NaCl-treated plants, regardless of Ca supplements, and closely associated with chloride, but not sodium, accumulation, in leaf tissues. The extent of the ameliorative properties of supplemental calcium applications on salinized rose plants is influenced by the salinity level, the chemical composition of the salinizing solution (major ions and counter-ions) and the cultivar (scion) and rootstock selection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower number, shoot length and chlorophyll index were similar across salt treatments for both rose rootstocks.

Taxon
Rosa × spp. L. ‘Happy Hour’t0
Outcome
Cumulative flowers harvested, shoot length and leaf chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
both rootstockse0

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative flowers harvested, shoot length and leaf chlorophyll index were similar for both rootstocks across salt treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa × spp. L. ‘Happy Hour’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manetti plants had higher flower and most tissue dry weights than Natal Briar plants, except roots.

Taxon
Manetti plantse0
Outcome
dry weights in flowers and most plant tissuese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“Manetti plants had higher dry weights in flowers and most plant tissues except roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental calcium did not change productivity or water relations in NaCl-salinized roses.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
supplemental Cae0
Outcome
Productivity and water relationse0
Direction
not responsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Productivity and water relations in NaCl-salinized plants were not responsive to supplemental Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium-supplemented roses under sodium sulfate salinity had better productivity and quality than those under sodium chloride salinity and resembled non-stressed controls.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Na 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
productivity and qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
similar to non-stressed control plantse0
Comparator
NaCle0

Verbatim

e0

“calcium-supplemented plants salinized with Na 2 SO 4 had better productivity and quality than those with NaCl, and were similar to non-stressed control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt injury occurred only on NaCl-treated roses regardless of calcium supplementation.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
Salt injury symptomse0
Direction
evident onlye0
Qualifier
regardless of Ca supplementse0

Verbatim

e0

“Salt injury symptoms were evident only on NaCl-treated plants, regardless of Ca supplements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–962 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose salt injury was closely associated with leaf chloride accumulation but not sodium accumulation.

Taxon
Rosest0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Compound
chloridee0
Outcome
Salt-Stressedt0
Direction
closely associatede0
Qualifier
but not sodiume0

Verbatim

e0

“closely associated with chloride, but not sodium, accumulation, in leaf tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salt-Stressed Roses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–57 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ameliorative effect of supplemental calcium on salinized roses depends on salinity level, salinizing-solution composition and scion/rootstock selection.

Taxon
rose plantse0
Treatment
supplemental calcium applicationse0
Outcome
ameliorative propertiese0
Direction
influenced bye0
Qualifier
salinity level, the chemical composition of the salinizing solution (major ions and counter-ions) and the cultivar (scion) and rootstock selectione0

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of the ameliorative properties of supplemental calcium applications on salinized rose plants is influenced by the salinity level, the chemical composition of the salinizing solution (major ions and counter-ions) and the cultivar (scion) and rootstock selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1320 · show in text ↑