Paper · 2019 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Mycorrhizas Mitigate Soil Replant Disease of Peach Through Regulating Root Exudates, Soil Microbial Population, and Soil Aggregate Stability

Li-Hui Lǚ; Ying-Ning Zou; Qiang-Sheng Wu

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
51
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil replant disease is the main bottleneck interfering with tree growth of peach in soils with poor traits. A potted study was conducted to evaluate the effects of inoculation with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Acauloapora scrobiculata, on plant growth, mineral nutrients, soil enzyme activities, soil microbial populations, and root exudate compositions of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) seedlings grown in replant soil and non-replant soil. After 15 weeks in AMF inoculation, replant soil heavily inhibited root mycorrhizal colonization. In replant soil, AMF inoculation significantly increased shoot biomass and root phosphorus, potassium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, and boron concentrations. Mycorrhizal peach seedlings showed a higher number of soil bacteria and total microbes but a lower number of soil fungi under replant conditions, as well higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity and lower soil sucrase and catalase activity. Greater soil aggregate stability was observed in mycorrhiza-inoculated replant soil than in non-mycorrhizal soil due to the increase of water-stable aggregates in 2–4 mm and 1–2 mm size. In addition, a total of 92 substances were identified in root exudates, and the mycorrhizosphere had considerably more root exudate compositions. AMF inoculation had a significantly inhibitive effect on the relative abundance of allelochemical substances, including benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalate, phenols, and sterols, while there was an increase in diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrile in replanted peach. It was concluded that AMF inoculation could partly mitigate soil replant disease of peach through modulating soil microbe balance, improving soil aggregate stability, and changing root exudate compositions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replant soil heavily inhibited mycorrhizal root colonization after 15 weeks.

Treatment
replant soile0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 15 weeks in AMF inoculation, replant soil heavily inhibited root mycorrhizal colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased peach shoot biomass in replant soil.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
replant soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In replant soil, AMF inoculation significantly increased shoot biomass and root phosphorus, potassium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, and boron concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased root phosphorus, potassium, calcium in peach roots in replant soil.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root phosphorus, potassium, calciume0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
replant soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In replant soil, AMF inoculation significantly increased shoot biomass and root phosphorus, potassium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, and boron concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased copper, zinc, iron in peach roots in replant soil.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
copper, zinc, irone0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
replant soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In replant soil, AMF inoculation significantly increased shoot biomass and root phosphorus, potassium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, and boron concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased boron concentrations in peach roots in replant soil.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
boron concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
replant soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In replant soil, AMF inoculation significantly increased shoot biomass and root phosphorus, potassium, calcium, copper, zinc, iron, and boron concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal peach seedlings had higher soil bacteria and total microbes under replant conditions.

Outcome
soil bacteria and total microbese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
replant conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal peach seedlings showed a higher number of soil bacteria and total microbes but a lower number of soil fungi under replant conditions, as well higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity and lower soil sucrase and catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal peach seedlings had lower soil fungi under replant conditions.

Outcome
soil fungie0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
replant conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal peach seedlings showed a higher number of soil bacteria and total microbes but a lower number of soil fungi under replant conditions, as well higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity and lower soil sucrase and catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal peach seedlings had higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity under replant conditions.

Outcome
soil urease and acid phosphatase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
replant conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal peach seedlings showed a higher number of soil bacteria and total microbes but a lower number of soil fungi under replant conditions, as well higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity and lower soil sucrase and catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal peach seedlings had lower soil sucrase and catalase activity under replant conditions.

Outcome
soil sucrase and catalase activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
replant conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal peach seedlings showed a higher number of soil bacteria and total microbes but a lower number of soil fungi under replant conditions, as well higher soil urease and acid phosphatase activity and lower soil sucrase and catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculation increased soil aggregate stability relative to non-mycorrhizal soil.

Treatment
mycorrhiza-inoculatede0
Outcome
soil aggregate stabilitye0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal soile0
Setting
replant soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater soil aggregate stability was observed in mycorrhiza-inoculated replant soil than in non-mycorrhizal soil due to the increase of water-stable aggregates in 2–4 mm and 1–2 mm size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculation increased water stable aggregates of 2–4 mm and 1–2 mm.

Treatment
mycorrhiza-inoculatede0
Outcome
water-stable aggregatese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2–4 mm and 1–2 mme0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal soile0
Setting
replant soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater soil aggregate stability was observed in mycorrhiza-inoculated replant soil than in non-mycorrhizal soil due to the increase of water-stable aggregates in 2–4 mm and 1–2 mm size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ninety two substances were identified in peach root exudates.

Outcome
substances were identified in root exudatese0
Value
92e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, a total of 92 substances were identified in root exudates, and the mycorrhizosphere had considerably more root exudate compositions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mycorrhizosphere had more root exudate compositions.

Outcome
root exudate compositionse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, a total of 92 substances were identified in root exudates, and the mycorrhizosphere had considerably more root exudate compositions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation inhibited relative abundance of benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalate.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalatee0
Direction
inhibitivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation had a significantly inhibitive effect on the relative abundance of allelochemical substances, including benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalate, phenols, and sterols, while there was an increase in diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrile in replanted peach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation inhibited relative abundance of phenols, and sterols.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
phenols, and sterolse0
Direction
inhibitivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation had a significantly inhibitive effect on the relative abundance of allelochemical substances, including benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalate, phenols, and sterols, while there was an increase in diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrile in replanted peach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrile increased in replanted peach.

Outcome
diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrilee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation had a significantly inhibitive effect on the relative abundance of allelochemical substances, including benzoic acid, benzaldehyde, diisooctyl phthalate, phenols, and sterols, while there was an increase in diphenyl-ethanedione and à-(benzoyloxy)-benzeneacetonitrile in replanted peach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that AMF inoculation could partly mitigate peach soil replant disease through changes in microbes, aggregates and exudates.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
soil replant disease of peache0
Qualifier
modulating soil microbe balance, improving soil aggregate stability, and changing root exudate compositionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was concluded that AMF inoculation could partly mitigate soil replant disease of peach through modulating soil microbe balance, improving soil aggregate stability, and changing root exudate compositions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1802 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: physics · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.