Paper · 2019 · Revista Caatinga

GERMINATION AND VIGOUR IN SEEDS OF THE COWPEA IN RESPONSE TO SALT AND HEAT STRESS

Luma Rayane de Lima Nunes; Paloma Rayane Pinheiro; Charles Lobo Pinheiro; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Salinity is prejudicial to plant development, causing different types of damage to species, or even between genotypes of the same species, with the effects being aggravated when combined with other types of stress, such as heat stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of cowpea genotypes (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) to salt stress at different temperatures. Seeds of the Pujante, Epace 10 and Marataoã genotypes were placed on paper rolls (Germitest®) moistened with different salt concentrations of 0.0 (control), 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 dS m-1, and placed in a germination chamber (BOD) at temperatures of 20, 25, 30 and 35°C. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomised design, in a 3 × 4 × 5 scheme of subdivided plots, with four replications per treatment. The variables under analysis were germination percentage, first germination count, shoot and root length, and total seedling dry weight. At temperatures of 30 and 35°C, increases in the salt concentration were more damaging to germination in the Epace 10 and Pujante genotypes, while for the Marataoã genotype, damage occurred at the temperature of 20°C. At 25°C, germination and vigour in the genotypes were higher, with the Pujante genotype proving to be more tolerant to salt stress, whereas Epace 10 and Marataoã were more tolerant to high temperatures. Germination in the cowpea genotypes was more sensitive to salt stress when subjected to heat stress caused by the low temperature of 20°C or high temperature of 35°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 and 35°C increasing salt damaged germination of Epace 10.

Material
Epace 10e0
Treatment
increases in the salt concentratione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
more damaginge0
Qualifier
30 and 35°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At temperatures of 30 and 35°C, increases in the salt concentration were more damaging to germination in the Epace 10 and Pujante genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 and 35°C increasing salt damaged germination of Pujante.

Material
Pujantee0
Treatment
increases in the salt concentratione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
more damaginge0
Qualifier
30 and 35°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At temperatures of 30 and 35°C, increases in the salt concentration were more damaging to germination in the Epace 10 and Pujante genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20°C salt damaged Marataoã germination.

Material
Marataoãe0
Treatment
salt concentratione1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
damage occurrede0
Qualifier
20°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the Marataoã genotype, damage occurred at the temperature of 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“increases in the salt concentration were more damaging to germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25°C germination and vigour were higher across genotypes.

Outcome
germination and vigoure0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
25°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 25°C, germination and vigour in the genotypes were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pujante was more salt tolerant.

Material
Pujantee0
Outcome
more tolerant to salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Pujante genotype proving to be more tolerant to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epace 10 was more tolerant to high temperatures.

Material
Epace 10e0
Outcome
more tolerant to high temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Epace 10 and Marataoã were more tolerant to high temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marataoã was more tolerant to high temperatures.

Material
Marataoãe0
Outcome
more tolerant to high temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Epace 10 and Marataoã were more tolerant to high temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea germination was more salt sensitive at 20°C and 35°C.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Qualifier
low temperature of 20°C or high temperature of 35°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination in the cowpea genotypes was more sensitive to salt stress when subjected to heat stress caused by the low temperature of 20°C or high temperature of 35°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1525 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

63 papers: 6 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.