Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Effect of date of planting, size of bulb sets and method of sowing on growth and yield of kharif onion (Allium cepa L)

Amandeep Kaur

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigations were conducted at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kapurthala, Punjab during kharif season 2017 to evaluate the effect of different planting dates, size of bulb sets and methods of sowing on growth and yield of kharif onion. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. All the crop management practices were followed as per the recommendation of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab. The statistical analysis of data revealed that bulb weight, bulb diameter and yield increased significantly with increase in size of bulb sets and non-significant differences were recorded for plant height, number of leaves and neck thickness. The planting time also had significant effect on various parameters under study. The planting date 16 July(D2)resulted in maximum plant height, bulb diameter, bulb weight and yield. All the growth and yield contributing parameters viz plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thickness, bulb weight and bulb yield were significantly better in bed planting as compared to flat planting system. The study revealed that planting of bulb size (2.7–3.1 cm) on 16 July by bed planting gave higher yield (223.800 q/ha) as compared to all other combinations of planting dates and size of bulb sets.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb weight, bulb diameter and yield of kharif onion increased significantly with larger bulb sets.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
size of bulb setse1
Outcome
bulb weight, bulb diameter and yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb weight, bulb diameter and yield increased significantly with increase in size of bulb sets and non-significant differences were recorded for plant height, number of leaves and neck thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, number of leaves and neck thickness showed non-significant differences among bulb set sizes.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
size of bulb setse1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves and neck thicknesse1
Direction
non-significant differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb weight, bulb diameter and yield increased significantly with increase in size of bulb sets and non-significant differences were recorded for plant height, number of leaves and neck thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting time had a significant effect on various parameters of kharif onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
planting timee1
Outcome
various parameterse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting time also had significant effect on various parameters under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 16 July (D2) gave the maximum plant height and bulb diameter.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
planting date 16 July(D2)e1
Outcome
plant height, bulb diametere1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting date 16 July(D2)resulted in maximum plant height, bulb diameter, bulb weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 16 July (D2) gave the maximum bulb weight and yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
planting date 16 July(D2)e1
Outcome
bulb weight and yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“The planting date 16 July(D2)resulted in maximum plant height, bulb diameter, bulb weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, number of leaves per plant and neck thickness were significantly better with bed planting than with flat planting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bed plantinge1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thicknesse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
flat planting systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thickness, bulb weight and bulb yield were significantly better in bed planting as compared to flat planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb weight and bulb yield were significantly better with bed planting than with flat planting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bed plantinge1
Outcome
bulb weight and bulb yielde1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
flat planting systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thickness, bulb weight and bulb yield were significantly better in bed planting as compared to flat planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb size 2.7–3.1 cm planted on 16 July by bed planting gave the highest yield (223.800 q/ha) compared with all other combinations of planting dates and bulb set sizes.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bulb size (2.7–3.1 cm) on 16 July by bed plantinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
223.800 q/hae1
Comparator
all other combinations of planting dates and size of bulb setse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of bulb size (2.7–3.1 cm) on 16 July by bed planting gave higher yield (223.800 q/ha) as compared to all other combinations of planting dates and size of bulb sets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1287 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.