Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant height, number of leaves per plant and neck thickness were significantly better with bed planting than with flat planting.

A claim from Effect of date of planting, size of bulb sets and method of sowing on growth and yield of kharif onion (Allium cepa L) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, number of leaves per plant and neck thickness were significantly better with bed planting than with flat planting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
bed plantinge1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thicknesse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
flat planting systeme1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of kharif onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239
e1

“plant height, number of leaves per plant, neck thickness, bulb weight and bulb yield were significantly better in bed planting as compared to flat planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1089

Title

Effect of date of planting, size of bulb sets and method of sowing on growth and yield of kharif onion (Allium cepa L)

Amandeep Kaur International Journal of Farm Sciences 2019. doi:10.5958/2250-0499.2019.00055.7

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4a70eecedabc6dac4489900bd9bd23d21d3c0892bfb84d6890341664f197999c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.